Should We Support "Defund the BBC"?

The BBC selects the news that supports its views.  It suppresses other news.  This has become such an ingrained reflex that the BBC now suppresses much of the news, keeping its audience ignorant of what is really happening in the world and country.  According to the BBC Charter the BBC should not have a "view", it is supposed to be impartial.

If after reading the following you agree that the BBC should be defunded, click on this link to the Defund the BBC Web Site.

The scientific data about the origin of COVID19 is still being suppressed.  The epidemiology and genetics of the COVID19 outbreak were inconsistent with the source of the outbreak being in the Hua Nan fish market in Wuhan and consistent with a laboratory escape. The BBC suggested that all speculations on the origins of COVID19 were "conspiracy theories" and gave prominence to incoherent ravings about 5G and Huawei being responsible.

The BBC has suppressed any mention of Hardware Trojans when discussing the installation of Huawei Equipment even though Hardware Trojans are a known and high risk. See Hardware Trojans And The Problem Of Trust In Integrated Circuits.  Of course the BBC computing and technical correspondents know about these but the BBC has steadfastly refused to mention them.

The BBC coverage of the Black Lives Matter protests has been highly selective. The BLM movement was founded by three Marxists who are committed to revolutionary change in the USA.  BLM is financed to the tune of over $100 million by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations which are infamous for doing the bidding of the CIA (See BLM: A Dangerous Conspiracy) and George Soros.  There has been scarcely a word about this on the BBC.  A silent Civil War in the US Administration might be of more than passing interest to the audience.

Soros also financed the "Peoples Vote" campaign in the UK but the BBC has made no mention of this. Soros started the campaign with a £620,000 donation.

The EU has the most shocking problem with racism but the BBC makes no mention of this. The UK has an excellent record on racism compared with the USA or EU but the BBC makes no mention of this.  These omissions stoked the UK BLM protests.

The BBC has re-opened the 200 year old issue of slavery. It suppresses all discussion of the ubiquity of slavery 200 years ago or who exactly in the British Empire and Black West Africa might have benefited but instead uses slavery to label the entire people of the UK as racist and guilty and all blacks as being descendants of slaves (even though 70% of UK Blacks are not).  The suppression of the truth is being used to polarise the people.

The BBC has never enunciated the terms for re-entering the EU, giving the impression that re-entry would be as simple as Remaining.  The Copenhagen Criteria have never been described. Publicising the fact that re-entry entails "adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union" would put the country at ease but the BBC has suppressed any mention of it.

The BBC gave huge prominence to investigations of Leave contributions but failed to mention that foreign US Banks and others made huge donations, using a gap in the Referendum rules: "The US banks are free to make donations now because the rules of the referendum have not been set and the campaigns are not officially registered. Once the rules are established, businesses’ ability to contribute may be restricted." (See Guardian Article) The BBC has never reported that the US Bank and corporate contributions happened in the month before the Referendum date was set. It is likely our Remain government told them when to make donations so they would not get caught.

The Leave campaign officially spent only about 60% of the official amount spent by Remain but the BBC never mentions this. The unofficial amount raised by Remain (see above) and its dubious source has never been mentioned by the BBC. The BBC has attempted to give the impression that Leave won by being the recipient of massive and fraudulent foreign contributions and has entirely suppressed the huge financial advantage enjoyed by Remain.  The official figures:

Across all campaign groups Remain spent £19.3m and Leave spent £13.3m. I know hardly anyone who is aware of these spending figures but thanks to the BBC nearly all Remain supporters believe it was the Russians who stole the Referendum by supplying vast amounts of finance to Arron Banks' UKIP Leave campaign. They have suppressed the truth.

The BBC has publicised allegations of Russian interference in the Referendum even though all expert opinion is that any interference was of minimal impact but has entirely suppressed any mention of the massive Irish and EU presence on Social Media that opposed Brexit.  In reality almost every other Leave post on Twitter would attract a Remain comment from the Republic of Ireland.


The BBC persistently has commentators such as Tony Blair (International Director for JP Morgan at $2m a year), Kenneth Clarke (Vice President of the European Movement), Michael Heseltine (President of the European Movement), Lord Adonis (Vice Chair European Movement), Stephen Dorrell (Chair European Movement) without any description of their role and bias.  The free publicity being given to the European Movement is appalling.

During the Referendum and the turmoil afterwards the BBC carefully hid any mention of the secretive "European Movement". Even when Ken Clarke was being proposed as a caretaker Prime Minister the BBC suppressed the fact that he was a Vice President of the European Movement and hence totally unsuitable.

The BBC gave huge prominence to the Treasury predictions of a massive recession due to a Referendum vote for Brexit.  This was almost the entire Remain campaign platform.  The predictions were for the period immediately after the Referendum.  The BBC suppressed any coverage in 2017-18 of the fact that the huge recession and massive unemployment never happened.

The BBC economics correspondents, such as Kamal Ahmed, suppressed any mention of the huge trade and current account deficits between the UK and EU and preserved the Treasury's reputation by suppressing news of its utter failure to produce reliable predictions for the period after the Referendum. This was topped off with the presentation of the next round of shaky predictions for after Brexit as if they were the gospel truth and produced by experts who had a spotless reputation. 

The people who had voted Remain felt they had been cheated by huge overspending by Leave, that the Treasury predictions were all true and that they had been given no reasons why Leave believed it was essential to leave the EU.  The BBC has continued the suppression of the truth to this day.  Even today the constitutional and economic reasons for leaving the EU are beyond report or discussion by the BBC. No wonder the country is divided. 

The staff involved should all be dismissed for a flagrant breach of their duty to inform fairly and impartially.

The BBC has striven to divide the country and to keep it divided.  There can be no doubt that the BBC is pro-EU, pro-Internationalist and Multinational big business, pro-China and revels in stoking up unrest about racism.  It now contains a news and drama output that is submerged in divisive ID politics rather than dealing with the lives of ordinary British people.

If having read this you agree that the BBC should be defunded, click on this link to the Defund the BBC Web Site.

Leaving the EU was supported by one Referendum and two elections.  It is the most democratic decision ever taken in the UK.  The BBC never points this out but still prefers to divide the country. Why?

The BBC has never accounted for how it ended up with almost 100% Remain staff.  John Humphreys drew this to our attention after he had left the BBC.  "The morning of the EU Referendum was different. Leave had won – and this was not what the BBC had expected. Nor what it wanted.

John Humphrys

No nods and smiles when the big bosses appeared. No attempt to pretend that this was anything other than a disaster. Their expressions were as grim as the look on the face of a football supporter when his team’s star player misses the penalty that would have won them the cup."  Daily Mail (21/9/2019).

Humphrys account has since been backed up by Rod Liddle and many other BBC staff.

Lets stop there for a moment.  Why did the BBC hire over 90% Remain supporting staff?  What were the employment polices that ensured all recruits were pro-EU?  Why was Rona Fairhead appointed by David Cameron to lead the BBC through the period of the EU Referendum?  Fairhead was an HSBC director of the Luxembourg subsidiary responsible for using EU rules to funnel billions of company profits out of the UK to tax havens.  Fairhead even attended a secretive meeting of the European Movement's Bilderberg Group before the referendum.

Humphrys then goes on to say that there were no orders from above, the bias was largely due to editors and presenters such as himself who all supported Remain and knew from the demeanor of their bosses that they were free to campaign against Brexit, despite the fact that there had just been a Referendum and the issue was decided.  The Referendum had been decided but the BBC gave as much coverage as possible to the so-called "Peoples Vote" campaign.  Where was the control from above to implement the Charter?

Then there is the problem of "Common Purpose".  The BBC sent numerous staff on "Common Purpose" education courses despite the fact that "Common Purpose" was avowedly Internationalist.

During the Referendum campaign and in the three years afterwards the BBC made no mention of the preambles to the EU Treaties that declare unequivocally that the purpose of the EU is to create a full union between signatories. As does the Copenhagen Criteria for re-entry to the EU.  As does the Five President's Report.  The public is still ignorant of these facts.