Skip to main content

The Paradise Papers - What about the Bankers? How can they be Innocent

Global Investment Banks have created a web of vehicles for dodging tax.  The Panama Papers, Luxembourg Leaks and the Paradise Papers show how these banks are syphoning billions away from the Tax Authorities globally.

What is happening is that International Banks effectively own offshore tax havens. They supply most of the revenue to these tiny countries, finance their governments and when necessary pay local politicians to obtain their ends. Don't believe this? Consider the facts: "More than 40,000 companies were registered in the Cayman Islands as of 2000, including almost 600 banks and trust companies with banking assets exceeding $500 billion." Wikipedia.  Yet the Cayman Islands has only 56,000 people. It is the same story for the Virgin Islands etc.

Many island tax havens are British Overseas Territories which means they get UK protection from invasion and relief in emergencies but are otherwise self governing. Most of these have been told by the UK that they can be independent if they so desire. Other tax havens are small countries like Luxembourg, Belize and Panama.  The world of International Finance and Banking controls these places. The Panama Papers etc. have opened a window on how this International Finance and Banking operates, an example of one of the leaks will be discussed below and then the problem of International Finance will be considered.

You may be thinking "Luxembourg Leaks"?? The reason you may not have heard of these is that the Chairman of the BBC Trust, until the end of 2016 was Rona Fairhead who was also a director of HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) that was at the centre of this Tax Evasion/Avoidance scandal. Fairhead has now been appointed a trade minister to mollify the "soft brexit" lobby in the government.  Notice that the Government will dismiss a minister for touching a woman's knee but elevates Rona Fairhead, who approved of the British taxpayer being deprived of billions in tax, to a ministerial post.

The "Lux Leaks" are actually the most significant of the recently leaked files.   Luxembourg does not charge tax on interest payments and has very low tax rates on payments for intellectual property such as brand names, patents, distribution rights etc.  Multinational Corporations are able to charge their subsidiaries interest and make charges for intellectual property and take this income in Luxembourg (courtesy of the open borders of EU Single Market).

Which corporations are involved? The Irish Times extracted the following list: Amazon, Accenture, Abbott Laboratories, American International Group (AIG),  Blackstone, Deutsche Bank, the Coach handbag empire, HJ Heinz, IKEA, JP Morgan Chase, Burberry, Pepsi, Procter & Gamble, the Carlyle Group and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.  All of these had been using HSBC, the banker that controlled the BBC through its Chairman.  It is ironic that the Irish Times was so active exposing tax avoidance when Ireland has special deals with multinationals (Google, Microsoft etc) to allow them to pay almost no corporate tax at all so they can shunt their cash to Luxembourg (where the banking expertise is domiciled) and hence to Holland and offshore.

In fact most Multinational Corporations can be suspected of using the EU-created Luxembourg route to avoid tax in the EU. Some are so powerful that smaller media outlets dare not challenge them and many were not in the "Lux Leaks" because they did not use HSBC. Microsoft uses Luxembourg to avoid tax on £1.7bn a year UK profit but the Irish Times did not include them in their list. It has just been reported that Apple has been shown in the Paradise papers to have avoided almost all tax in the EU.  Basically we must assume that ALL Multinational Corporations operating in the EU have been using the EU sanctioned routes to dodge tax.   You should be glad to learn that those who provided the "Lux Leaks" had their sentences reduced on appeal .

The icing on the cake of EU laws for Multinationals and Banks is that having got money to a low tax destination in the EU the Dutch still let you ship it anywhere in the world.

The real problem here is not Microsoft and the Queen dodging tax, it is the International Finance industry providing a global infrastructure for tax dodging.  Tax avoidance by Multinational Corporations costs the UK billions of pounds a year. Recovering this tax could end Austerity.  The focus of the media on the singer Bono or the Queen is a deliberate distraction from the real problem and this should make us reflect on the sheer power of the International Finance industry.

The key players in the International Finance industry are the International Banks, especially HSBC, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, the international consultancies from Accenture to Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) and the EU.  The banks effectively own the tax havens and adjust local laws to permit the massaging of money into their coffers.  The international consultancies and smaller investment banks sell the International bank products to their wealthy corporate and private clients who freely move money courtesy of the EU.  Tax Havens are like the Pirate Kingdoms of Old except instead of Henry Morgan as Governor there is a Cabal of Bankers.

The way to stop International Finance from providing tax avoidance products is to charge tax on all overseas transfers of money unless these are clearly and fairly justifiable.  Banks that deal with foreign transfers of money would have a legal obligation to declare any that exceeded, say, £20,000 total in a year, to the tax authorities.  Taxation experts would then need to judge whether these transfers were bona-fide or for tax avoidance (such as spurious payments for the use of a brand name etc). If tax avoidance were suspected then the transfer would be taxed as if it were profits.  In tax jargon a "withholding tax" would be charged. (This simple solution is obviously impossible in the EU Single Market).

Taxing foreign transfers as profits is complex because, for instance, nearly 80% of the components of Vauxhall cars produced in Ellesmere Port come from the EU, and require transfers of cash out of the UK.  There would need to be spot checks on such imports to ensure that they were being acquired at competitive prices.  It would be impossible to police this within the EU Single Market.

One thing that is absolutely certain is that the EU has been a key player in setting up tax avoidance schemes for Multinational Corporations - after all, Jean-Claude Juncker, the President of the EU Commission, was Prime Minister of Luxembourg during the whole period covered by the Lux Leaks and has not been held to account anywhere. It must be assumed, even if it is subsequently found to be an unfair assumption, that Juncker was owned by the banks in Luxembourg and is still owned by them and that his appointees are equally dubious.

Bernie Sanders pointed out the obvious truth that there is an International Oligarchy intent upon extracting money from the People whilst avoiding the costs of training, welfare, sustainability and health.  This Oligarchy is composed of International Bankers and Multinational Corporations and the media focus on the odd rich actor or businessman is a distraction from who is really behind all this.  The Bankers and Multinational Corporations are organised and out to make the world their fiefdom. 

It was the organised, International Oligarchy that financed Remain in the Referendum -  see Funding of the StrongerIn Campaign in the EU Referendum. Those who support Remaining in the EU either "don't get it", are indoctrinated or are working for the bad guys.

Postscript: The EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive does not address transfers such as those in the Lux Leaks. It applies to transfers into and out of the EU and, as noted above, the Dutch don't seem to have heard about it.  It was a smoke screen to persuade people that something was being done.   Tax avoidance is a property of a system that has free movement of trade and capital but various rates of tax in its different states.  Tax avoidance is a property of the Single Market.


Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Political Thoughts

Politics is the struggle for power. The fundamental power struggle is between the people of a place and the mobile classes.  Few people would turn their own garden into a motorway or commit their next door neighbours to slave working.  The mobile classes can do these things without conscience because their garden and their neighbours are not fixed. Locality is central to politics because it separates real issues from ideological issues.  Real issues such as being unable to find work, having insufficient money to pay for the basics of life, having poor schooling and healthcare etc. are all local.  If you are mobile you can move to somewhere that has work and good wages, schools and healthcare. If the answer to any problem is to change locality then the problem is not solved, it is avoided for you personally but the problem remains for others.  If politicians must live among those who suffer the results of their political decisions then those decisions must be humane but if they can move

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome