Skip to main content

Labour confirms multiculturalism and mass immigration are bad

In two broadcasts today (see Too little done to integrate UK Society) Ed Miliband, the Labour leader and Sadiq Khan, the shadow Justice Secretary, said that Labour had been mistaken not to tackle the "realities of segregation".  Miliband rejected Labour's previous policy  where people "live side by side in their own communities, respecting each other but living separate lives, protected from hatreds but never building a common bond - never learning to appreciate one another".

It is good to see that Labour have come to terms with the fact that multiculturalism was a vicious Labour policy and a mistake.

Miliband is also renouncing mass immigration: " in his speech he will make clear he would consider keeping the government's cap on migration from outside the EU if there is evidence that it works".
The graph above shows the scale of UK immigration. ONS Data. Notice how Labour started mass migration in 1997 as a policy. ( Immigration into the UK accounts for 30% of all EU population growth. Immigration over 250000 a year is "mass immigration". See Predicted population of Britain.)

Those who still support multiculturalism and immigration are usually not numerate.  They do not understand that over 500,000 immigrants a year in a small island is an epic and impossible number.  They are still living in the days of the racist/anti-racist arguments of the 1980s when immigration involved relatively few immigrants and have not moved on to address the industrial scale of immigration that we see today.

A word of warning. Labour have always said that they will control immigration and believe in integration when it has suited them.  In 2009, after Andrew Neather confessed that Labour had a deliberate policy of mass immigration a Labour Home Office spokesman said:

“The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”

Lies, damn lies.  Judge Labour by its record and never vote for them again.  Never vote Tory or Lib-Dem again either.

All we need now is for politicians to stop making racist statements such as how much better it is to be in a modern society rather than in a society filled with white English people.  They always get applauded for such statements by their postmarxist audience but this is naked racism.  How else would one explain the massive changes in our society except with the realisation that the postmarxists are authoritarian racists who have made our children into racists (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism ).  It is time that the young threw off the shackles of this indoctrination and stopped seeing the world in postmarxist black and white.

If you found this article interesting link to it, tweet it (TinyURL  http://tinyurl.com/arhxjjv ),  and tell your friends!  Even Labour says that mass immigration and multiculturalism are wrong but it continues.  Only the BBC support it now.  How will it stop if you say nothing? 

See also:

Multiculturalism

The devastating effects of immigration on the economy and society of the UK

ONS: The predicted population of the UK

Is the pro-immigration lobby racist?

Against racism

Global warming: what do we do now?

Should universities and colleges be financed by offering residence in the UK?

Immigration, house prices and boom economics

The UK Housing Crisis


Tony Blair defends open door policy on immigration.

Labour wanted mass migration

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...