It is plainly absurd to discriminate between people on the basis of sun tan or the origin of a person's parents.
It is absurd that TV programs insist that the white male lead has a white female love interest and the black supporting actor has a black female. And in the theatre Shakespeare should be performed by actors of any colour, black actors should not be relegated to playing Othello. Historical dramas should have modern English people of all our shades of skin playing the parts. Shakespeare and drama are about the soul not the skin.
It is also plainly absurd to prohibit people from criticising the cultures and religions of other people. The concept of caste, female circumcision, the oppression of women, child sacrifice etc. are abominations that must be confronted in the UK. Attempts to confuse culture with "race" are never without a *subversive intention such as to increase revolutionary tension or to prepare a nation for absorption into an empire such as the EU or Russia. To label opposition to such subversion as "racist" delivers these people their prize. (See Multiculturalism). If a person says "the Lilliputians are hopeless, they are incapable of self government" this is a valid comment about systems of government and not racist. Notice that I used "Lilliputians" and not a real country to avoid falling foul of the Equality Act 2010
It is also absurd to be pro-immigration because you are anti-racist. Immigration is about economics, social provision and sustainability. Those who are pro-immigration to "rub the nose of the right in diversity" are rotten at heart (see The Roots of New Labour). Such people have not noticed that England is already very diverse and now they are playing with people's lives and possibly the very survival of the population of this country in the future to further their own dystopian, left-wing or post-modern, vision. (See Predicted population of Gt Britain). Incidentally, if you are anti-immigration you have a democratic tool, just never vote Labour again, Labour set up the current mass migration in 1997 - just look at the migration graphs.
The extension of the idea of "racism" beyond passive characteristics is a deliberate ploy of Postmarxists. The voting public have not been alerted to the way that postmarxists are now using the extended idea of racism to divide people into warring factions.
See:
Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism
Equality Act 2010 - read it and be afraid
*Subversion: where a group within a larger group supports the larger group but has undeclared motives and intentions that are against the interests or constitution of the larger group. All human groups contain subversives and these sub-groups are often benign, but anti-democratic groups such as communists and post-Marxists are clearly dangerously subversive if they are hiding within a political party that has public policies that are not anti-democratic or are working in the media in a democratic country.
It is absurd that TV programs insist that the white male lead has a white female love interest and the black supporting actor has a black female. And in the theatre Shakespeare should be performed by actors of any colour, black actors should not be relegated to playing Othello. Historical dramas should have modern English people of all our shades of skin playing the parts. Shakespeare and drama are about the soul not the skin.
It is also plainly absurd to prohibit people from criticising the cultures and religions of other people. The concept of caste, female circumcision, the oppression of women, child sacrifice etc. are abominations that must be confronted in the UK. Attempts to confuse culture with "race" are never without a *subversive intention such as to increase revolutionary tension or to prepare a nation for absorption into an empire such as the EU or Russia. To label opposition to such subversion as "racist" delivers these people their prize. (See Multiculturalism). If a person says "the Lilliputians are hopeless, they are incapable of self government" this is a valid comment about systems of government and not racist. Notice that I used "Lilliputians" and not a real country to avoid falling foul of the Equality Act 2010
It is also absurd to be pro-immigration because you are anti-racist. Immigration is about economics, social provision and sustainability. Those who are pro-immigration to "rub the nose of the right in diversity" are rotten at heart (see The Roots of New Labour). Such people have not noticed that England is already very diverse and now they are playing with people's lives and possibly the very survival of the population of this country in the future to further their own dystopian, left-wing or post-modern, vision. (See Predicted population of Gt Britain). Incidentally, if you are anti-immigration you have a democratic tool, just never vote Labour again, Labour set up the current mass migration in 1997 - just look at the migration graphs.
The extension of the idea of "racism" beyond passive characteristics is a deliberate ploy of Postmarxists. The voting public have not been alerted to the way that postmarxists are now using the extended idea of racism to divide people into warring factions.
See:
Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism
Equality Act 2010 - read it and be afraid
*Subversion: where a group within a larger group supports the larger group but has undeclared motives and intentions that are against the interests or constitution of the larger group. All human groups contain subversives and these sub-groups are often benign, but anti-democratic groups such as communists and post-Marxists are clearly dangerously subversive if they are hiding within a political party that has public policies that are not anti-democratic or are working in the media in a democratic country.
Comments
Do you really think Hamlet or Richard III could be played by black (or Asian)actors? So could Othello be played by a white person?