Skip to main content

China: Britain and the West are living in the past.

Dominic Raab, Joe Biden and the EU are all proposing that we continue and even increase trade with China.  They all talk of constructive engagement giving the West influence over the Chinese.

This approach might have appeared reasonable twenty years ago but today it is absurd.  China has the highest GDP in the world (in PPP terms*) and dominates global trade.  China is the number one trading power in the world with 13.45% of global exports, followed by the US at 8.98% (See China Power).

Shanghai

China is a mercantilist power that trades at a surplus with almost all of its trading partners and is hence a risk to all of our economies.  Its mercantilism has allowed it to amass three trillion dollars of foreign exchange reserves.  These reserves make it immune from threats of sanctions or the discontinuance of trade.  The West cannot threaten China but if the West gets ever more closely entangled in trade with China then China can threaten the West.

China has already shown that it is willing to exercise its commercial clout.  It threatened Australia with trade sanctions for merely asking for an investigation of the origins of COVID19 and when the Australians resisted it imposed sanctions.  It even bullied the EU into amending reports on COVID19.  It is claiming vast tracts of land and sea in SE Asia and is receiving only token opposition.

I have regularly visited China for the past 20 years and have been absolutely astonished by its growth.  When US, UK and EU politicians talk about China they are not talking about the China that I have seen but about some fantasy country based on images from 30 years ago.  In 1990 China was a regional power that would think twice before attacking even weakened neighbours such as Vietnam.  In 2021 it is possibly the world's leading conventional military power and is rapidly becoming a nuclear superpower with the objective of rivalling the USA.  It is certainly the world's leading economic power and far richer than the official data suggests.

It is China's money and tactics that give it real power now.   China invests its trillions of surplus using offshore companies in the Cayman and Virgin Islands.  (See How much of the world is owned by China).  This makes its investments opaque.  China has enough cash to give it control of all of the West's mainstream media and no-one would realise that China had this control.  It produces the parts for almost every type of communications device and computer used in the West and has a law that compels China's manufacturers to provide means by which the Chinese security services can hack into them.  Our politicians and journalists seem never to have heard of the undetectable "hardware trojans" that manufacturers can easily introduce into any integrated circuit. (See We need to talk about China).

China is the greatest threat to Western democracy in history.  The Third Reich was an equal of any one of the UK (a superpower at the time), the USA or Russia but now China is rapidly becoming an equal power with the entire West.  If China wins then human civilisation will be under the yoke of tyranny for a millennium (See Why China is a Pariah State).  

We may already be too late to stop China.  We would be stupid beyond measure to continue the present policies of freely trading with China, accepting their investments and educating their spies by the hundred thousand.  If you think this article is extreme then you, like our out of date politicians, have not grasped the sheer level of the threat.

* PPP = Purchase Power Parity: it is a measure of the purchasing power of the average person in China.  It allows for the fact that countries like China keep their exchange rate with the dollar artificially low.

See
 
 
 
 
Also see
 
 
 
17/3/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...