Skip to main content

Tibetans moved to Concentration Camps, Uyghur Camps expanded.

China has reacted to the failure of the West to condemn Concentration Camps for Uyghurs and to the West ignoring the origin of COVID19 by expanding these camps and sending 500,000 Tibetans into forced labour.

Western governments seem to have forgotten that you cannot appease National Socialists such as China.

Perhaps as bad as the Concentration Camps are the forced labour transfer schemes where Uyghurs and Tibetans are scattered across China in small groups to work as forced labour for Amazon, Nike etc.  Over 80,000 Uyghurs have been forced out of Xinjiang in this way.  The factories that use them pay a charge per head, the labourers are then housed in separate blocks with Chinese "minders" to ensure that they do not engage in religious worship or other "subversive" activity.

China is also demolishing whole towns in Xinjiang, scattering their inhabitants across China and replacing them with Han Chinese.  In both Tibet and Xinjiang China is using population replacement by the Han to occupy the land.

The Destruction of Uyghur Towns

In Tibet the Chinese are forcing Tibetans into large work camps.  Half a million having been placed in work camps since January.  This is a third of the native Tibetan population.

China is also summarily executing those Uyghurs who are accused of terrorism (such as speaking freely) and executing members of the harmless Falun Gong religion then using their organs to treat Han Chinese who need transplants.

This is as bad as it gets.  As bad as Germany in 1938. 

 

 
What we are witnessing is exactly the same as occurred with National Socialism in Italy and Germany in the 1930s.  The National Socialists prodded the Allies with treaty violations and re-occupations/occupations of territory and each time they got away with it they were emboldened.  Multinational Corporations supported the National Socialists to the hilt and CEOs such as Henry Ford were heroes of the National Socialist cause.  The media were generally sympathetic to National Socialism, as they are today, believing that any movement supported by the Left, like National Socialism was supported by Communist Russia, and also supported by their Multinational paymasters, must be benign.  

National Socialism is democracy's only real competitor because it also feeds on a capitalist economy and hence has the economic volume required for power.  Multinational Corporations who support the capitalist National Socialists cannot distinguish between repressive and democratic capitalism because they have no moral compass.

Over the past 20 years the Western media has attempted to portray the meteoric rise of China as harmless and has portrayed those who point out what is happening as doing so for self interested political reasons.  Most people in the West are unaware that China is now a modernised State with six lane highways and a military that is threatening to match that of the USA in equipment and greatly outmatch it in numbers. The power of the Multinational Corporations and China is breathtaking.

Meanwhile the broadcast media, such as the BBC, are doing all they can to divert us from reality with ID Politics.

Today it is Xinjiang and Tibet, tomorrow it will be Taiwan and the South China Sea, after that it will be war with India.  This is probably the last chance we have to turn the tide, China must be expelled from the WTO and embargoed, its overseas assets seized.

See The Xinjiang Data Project

and More Evidence that COVID19 is Man Made (in China). 

and Factcheckers rely on one source for origins of COVID19 so suppressing all new data on its origin. 

Video from the Sydney Morning Herald:



24/9/2020


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage