Democracy under Attack from Tech Giants!

Twitter, Facebook etc. are banning Republicans. It should be understood that the political role of these social media giants is not new, they have been routinely biased outside of the USA for years. (See Is Twitter a Menace?). The misperception of Twitter as a platform for free speech has had enormous ramifications. As an example the UK Commons Committee on interference in the EU Referendum failed to notice that Twitter had routinely shadow banned and outright banned Leave users. Facebook was doing the same to any private groups who attempted to set up pro-Leave Facebook pages.

The political role of Google and Apple is now also out in the open as they ban and shadow ban Republican platforms. Again the bias at Google was known for some time (See Google, Twitter, Facebook are all biased ) but rejected as a "conspiracy theory" despite the obvious evidence.

The issue for the UK is that we have allowed these organisations to monopolise our Internet. This foreign interference can be stopped with a National Firewall. At the moment Vietnam, Russia, China, UAE, Egypt, Turkey and Iran have full National Firewalls but now that the US tech giants are openly admitting to controlling content for political purposes we should expect this to spread. The UK should make a National Firewall a priority, not just to save our democracy but also to secure bank transactions, the Internet of things and the domestic retail industry. The other reason for a National Firewall is that China is an exceptionally sophisticated enemy with extremely deep pockets and long term strategies. This means that if there is a showdown with China at some time in the future we may be shocked to discover that they can turn us off.

The UK should establish a National Firewall and regulate foreign sales emporia such as Amazon and foster domestic social media platforms.

The failure of the UK to treat the Internet as a strategic resource on the front line of commercial and military conflict will have catastrophic consequences if it continues.

11/1/2021

Comments

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith. What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas? In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata. The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile. In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president. Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue? What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems. Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out. The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark. Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions. The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage

Political Thoughts - the magazine

Search This Blog