Google, Twitter, Facebook are all biased. This is serious.

When the tech giants rose to power I had an uneasy feeling that this was the start of something dangerous. What is to stop companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook from simply, automatically, suppressing political opinions that they detest? What is to stop them from taking money to do this?

China already uses its equivalent of Google - Baidu - to stop any freedom of speech. Search for Tienanmen Square on Baidu and you will find that the reports of deaths and demos are a myth. Sadly the same thing is happening here.

The US website Breitbart , which by UK standards is fairly right wing, is an interesting case. It was savagely cut from visibility in July 2017 and has recovered to an apparently artificially imposed ceiling in March this year after complaints.

Data from SISTRIX

Breitbart is the only site I have seen with deeply suspicious visibility figures. The Guardian seems little affected (theguardian.com is a recent internet site, it was guardian.co.uk):

The Daily Mail seems to have taken a heavy tumble:

It is obvious that with information comes power and also obvious that those in control of the information will not be able to keep their hands off the supply. There is an interesting account in the Daily Caller of how Google employees felt they should be helping the Democrats in any future election. Google uses the practices current in China of employing people to rate internet sites or ban them.

These practices were undoubtedly started by the need to screen terrorist sites but the line is becoming increasingly blurred into outright bias.

There are three possible solutions. The first is that the UK should, like the USA via Google and China via Baidu, have its own internet search engine whilst banning others. The second is that internet search engines should be regarded as publishers and held legally responsible for all search content. The third is that only truly open internet search engines should be permitted that have simple, public criteria for ranking and excluding content. All of these solutions depend on the first being applied, the UK must have its own search engine.

Do British regulators and Parliamentarians have the courage to defend democracy?

It is not just Google, there is evidence that Twitter is also a menace. Facebook appears to be the least biased of the three giants although there is evidence that it relies on "fact" checkers that have an agenda. This is particularly dubious in the case of fact checking fast moving scientific developments such as the origins of COVID19.

See Restructuring the UK Economy after Coronavirus which details how the Internet must be tackled.

23/9/2020

Comments

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith. What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas? In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata. The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile. In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president. Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue? What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems. Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out. The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark. Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions. The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage

Political Thoughts - the magazine

Search This Blog