On Monday the Chinese army opened fire at the China-India border for the first time since 1975. The firing seems to have been warning shots made as the Indians and Chinese jockeyed for the high ground and passes in Ladakh. The firing follows an attempt by 1000 Chinese troops to occupy the south bank of the Pangon Tso river on the 28th of August.
The Pentagon's latest report, "Military and Security Developments Involving the Peoples Republic of China 2020 ", predicts that China will double it's nuclear weapons capability over the next decade.
The report points out that "As Party leaders view a divided China as a weak China, they argue that “full reunification”—unification with Taiwan on Beijing’s terms and completing Hong Kong and Macau’s integration by the end of 2049—is a fundamental condition of national rejuvenation."
China is disarmingly honest about its objectives. If it states that Taiwan will be invaded by 2049 then we should expect this to happen.
According to the report Beijing contends that 100 countries have agreed to form a “strategic partnership” with China. The Belt and Road initiative has financed this international change in stance towards China - money talks.
China has stated that it has “indisputable sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea and the adjacent waters, and enjoys sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant waters as well as the seabed and subsoil thereof”. The claim includes all of the ocean from the north coast of Indonesia, past Vietnam to mainland China. The claim is like, say, Spain, claiming the Mediterranean.
 |
| Source: "Military and Security Developments Involving the Peoples Republic of China 2020 " |
The People's Liberation Army is being armed for offshore conflict (PLA). "The PRC has more than 1,250 ground-launched ballistic missiles (GLBMs)
and ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCMs) with ranges between 500 and
5,500 kilometers." The objective is to deny aircraft carrier access to Taiwan and the South China Sea, the "CSS-5 ASBMs [are] specifically designed to hold adversary aircraft carriers at risk when located up to 1,500 km off China’s coast, and [China] has an ASBM variant of the longer range DF-26 IRBM."
China is a member of the WTO but ignores almost all of the requirements for membership from protection of intellectual property rights to access to internal markets. It is difficult to see how this can be rectified because China has bought widespread international support with the $3 trillion in foreign currency it has acquired from imbalanced trading. China demonstrates that capitalism and trade do not result in freedom so the entire reason for allowing China into the WTO is now known to be false.
The depth of China's penetration of the UK can be seen in the response to Huawei. China does not permit foreign communications providers for security reasons:
"National Security Law: Adopted in July 2015, the law limits foreign access to the information and communications technology (ICT) market in China on national security grounds."
China has a "Military-Civil Fusion Development Strategy" such that all civilian businesses are ultimately accountable to the military and must aid military procurement of technology and data. Huawei must be assumed to represent the PLA. Yet numerous "experts" have defended using Huawei as the backbone of UK communications. It must be assumed that the UK has been heavily penetrated by Chinese intelligence, mostly through soft bribes such as career enhancement and share purchases etc. All civil projects in China from bridges to gas pipelines are coordinated with the military to ensure that national defence objectives are served. All businesses in China are assumed to have a dual civil/military use. There is no such thing as a purely civilian enterprise in China. China is prepared for war.
The UK media has also entirely failed to mention that BLM is a Maoist group connected to the FRSO and hence has deep connections with Chinese
Intelligence.
Tsinghua University is affiliated with the PLA and used for large international collaborative projects such as those with the Scripps Institute. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is now run by the military. Several other universities in China are affiliated with the PLA.
In World War II China was attacked with biological weapons by Japan. As a sign of moral outrage at these despicable attacks China announced that it would not maintain a biological warfare capability. However, it is now 75 years since WWII and China has housed its biowarfare research in dual use facilities such as at Wuhan. When China finally signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 1984 it did so with a strong caveat. China included the stipulation that the treaty was binding only in
regard to its relations with other state parties, and would cease to be
binding in regard to any enemy states whose armed forces or allies did
not observe the convention's provisions. In other words, if any country has bioweapons China will have bioweapons. Bioweapons research requires level 4 containment. In 2007, it was also announced that China would open its first BSL-4
laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, part of the Chinese
Academy of Science. China completed the facility in January 2015. Since COVID19 the Wuhan Institute is now under full military control.
We must not forget that China is the most repressive power the world has ever seen because it has implemented automated surveillance and control of all communications and activity by its citizens. It is a blueprint for a nightmare future. Despite this our media are full of apologists for China and the view is still prevalent that by engaging with China they will be unable to resist the charms of Western civilisation. It is time to break the news that by engaging with China the West will be unable to resist the nightmare of Chinese civilisation.
9/9/2020
Comments