Skip to main content

BBC News Suppression to 9/8/2020

To fulfill its Charter the BBC is charged with offering "a range and depth of analysis and content not widely available from other United Kingdom news providers".  Does the BBC fulfill its Charter obligation?

Illegal Migration across the Channel has risen sharply.  The BBC explanation for this is that the UK is such an attractive place that all the migrants want to come here.   The next BBC article is about Black Lives Matter in Britain and the article implies there is a huge problem with racism in the UK.  

There is an inconsistency between the BBC reports of the UK being an attractive place for migrants and the UK being the site of rampant racism.  Furthermore the BBC suppresses the context of migration from the EU and never covers EU Racism - see: EU Racism is far worse than UK and always suppresses the strides made by the UK relative to other countries in tackling racism.

The BBC also resolutely refuses to mention that the French Navy escorts migrants into British waters.  The BBC seems incapable of linking French dumping of people on the UK to get concessions on fishing rights with the same tactic used by Turkey to get EU finance.

The BBC suppresses any mention of overpopulation on this small island when discussing migration.  Unsustainable population growth in the UK is driven by migration and it will destroy the British countryside. (See BBC's own Countryfile Magazine - some people at the BBC know there is a problem but it is suppressed).

On Coronavirus the BBC still maintains that the HuaNan fish market in Wuhan was the origin of the pandemic despite a recent statement in Science Magazine by Shi Zhengli, the scientist at the centre of Wuhan bat virus research, saying that: “The Huanan seafood market may just be a crowded location where a cluster of early novel coronavirus patients were found.”  This new statement, by a professor of virology with direct knowledge of the investigations of HuaNan market, should not have been suppressed.  The BBC is still suppressing the strong evidence that COVID19 was a lab escape and refuses to mention that 1000s of bat viruses were taken to Wuhan and even modified by Shi Zhengli to increase their virulence. The BBC also suppresses the fact that there are two major virology labs in Wuhan and virology labs in China have a bad record of lab escapes.  It is still suppressing coverage of the fact that human to human transmission of COVID19 was obvious in mid January when the WHO said publicly that it did not occur and hence precipitated the pandemic.

The BBC has apologised for using the "N Word" when describing an attack on a black man who has given journalists the pseudonym "K Dogg".  This whole incident is peculiar because "K Dogg" is an American rap artist.  K Dogg uses extremely offensive language but I will not give examples because other people have been fined and sentenced for reproducing these lyrics on-line owing to the fact that they contain versions of the "N Word".  The BBC has suppressed all details of the real identity of the attack victim, all details of the real K Dogg and all details of how others were sentenced for simply reproducing K Dogg lyrics. 

The BBC broadcast news has resolutely refused any in-depth discussion of the latest Hate Crime laws being introduced in Scotland although these have been covered by the BBC online.  According to many responsible observers these laws will be a major step towards ending Free Speech in Scotland.

In the last days of its current Director General, Tony Hall, the BBC is operating by selecting events out of context from the present news and from the whole of British history to mount an attack on British society on behalf of Internationalist and foreign agencies. See Black Lives Matter: A Dangerous Conspiracy?.  This is against its Charter and should be stopped.

 

See
 
 



29/07/2020

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...
49 comments
Read more

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...
35 comments
Read more

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...
15 comments
Read more