Skip to main content

What has Arctic Ice got to do with the European Union?

Arctic sea ice has a record low extent today for April:

When the Arctic loses all of its ice we will be in big trouble.  The polar weather systems will shift towards Greenland, the Jet Stream will be heavily displaced and food production will become chaotic. There could even be drastic tipping points being crossed such as the thawing of the permafrost and release of methane from shallow Arctic waters.  Tipping points that could kill billions.

What caused this?

The Multinational Oil and Car producers waged a campaign against the whole idea of global warming that halted effective action for 40 years. The Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson famously said: "What good is it to save the planet if humanity suffers?"[112] . See Exxon Mobile and Climate Change Controversy and Global Climate Coalition.

Western countries implemented emission standards for industry throughout the late 20th century but the Multinational Corporations shifted production to China and India and sourced product from these places.

How is the EU involved?  In 1954 Jozef Retinger, president of the European Movement - the political power behind the EU, set up the Bilderberg Group to provide finance and power for the establishment of the European Union.  The Bilderberg Group is arguably the most powerful organisation in the world and it is composed of those Multinational Corporations that are destroying the world. 

Multinationals live off international trade.  They need no borders so that labour and money can flow freely, they need pipelines for profits so that they pay low taxes, they need powerful puppets inside powerful Nations so that they can control global events.  They control the broadcast media both directly and through advertising to further their agenda.

Most of all the multinationals need a band of fanatical EU Nationalists to implement their agenda.  They use all the normal slogans "better together", "change", "cooperation", "the opponents are racist" etc. to persuade people to support them. They need people to post Renault-Nissan, BMW and Ryan Air's views on what is best for us on social media.

Now we have the crazy spectacle of people draped in EU Flags at one demonstration and then the same people draped in Green at the next.  It is as if the people have lost the power of reason.  They will say "we need all the large corporations in the world to come together in a single organisation to fight this problem" without realising that this is being done right now to create the problem.

Here is a list of the Bilderberg attendees who were at the meeting that delegated the setting up of "Britain Stronger in Europe" to Goldman Sachs and the European Movement (notice the "impartial" BBC is on the list):

The combination of giant corporations into powerful groups is the greatest threat to our democracies and Nations.  Conspiracy theory?  It is amazing how people can say that the joint endeavour of the richest and most powerful on the planet is harmless.  That those who point out the dangers are labelled by the rich and powerful's media as conspiracy theorists should set alarm bells ringing.  There has been total silence from the media even when it is public knowledge that the European Movement set up the Bilderberg Group to further its aims.  The media shy away from confronting Bilderberg and never mention how it delegates its control in Europe. There has been total silence, for instance, about Goldman Sachs being tasked to set up StrongerIn - see The Funding of the StrongerIn Campaign.

These people are ruthless and professional.  Political truths are nothing to them because they deal in hard cash. They will promise anything and then do nothing.

More information on global warming: The Greens Lost the Battle and Global Warming: man or nature?.

More on Corporate power: The Great War: Corporatism vs Freedom.

12/04/2019



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage