Skip to main content

The Greens lost the battle

What are the major green issues?  Is the major issue how much plastic we recycle?  Is it "nimby" resistance to wind turbines?

No.  By far and away the greatest issue is that human beings have destroyed about half of all life on earth and it is still happening.  We have been politically cunning and created reserves for plants and animals so that it is possible to say "mass extinction, what mass extinction? Very few species have become extinct!" whilst gaily converting the land into urban wastelands and agri-deserts.

The main green issues were fully understood forty years ago. When global population was only 4 to 5 billion the founders of green parties realised that a population explosion was under way.

Population Matters
Even before "global warming" became an issue it was obvious that the environment was being degraded.

Tranquillity Map - See MN Consultors
Unfortunately, as can be seen from the graphs and maps above, the green parties and lobbyists had almost no effect.  The disaster has largely happened.  It has happened over several generations so each generation only gets an inkling of the sheer extent of the damage as it gets too old to have any real influence.

The green problem was always, at its heart, population growth.  The Green Party has utterly failed to make it clear that global warming is largely a problem of population growth.

Of course some parts of the globe use more resource than others but then the others catch up so that overall, in the long term, it is population that is the governing factor. (Can anyone really argue that if the population of the world stayed at, say, 4bn, then human beings would have had the same impact as they do now? - see Note 1)

Yet Green campaigners weakened, they let the religious and other lobbies (including Big Business) shut down the whole idea of controlling population.

The UK Green Party seems to be a pale shadow of its former self.  It has conceded defeat on the major issues and now specialises in policies to allow people to feel "Green" whilst continuing the policies that are devastating nature.

The UK Green Party is now part of the problem.  In the UK, as in the, world in general, the problem is still population growth which, in the UK, is almost entirely due to migration.

See Why are people still pressing for more migration?
In 2012 8% of UK land was covered by buildings, roads and construction sites ( Corine Land Use  ) Between 2006 and 2012 "Over 7,000 hectares were converted from forest to artificial surfaces, and over 14,000 hectares changed from agricultural areas to artificial surfaces" - 81 square miles of complete urbanisation in 6 years! Yet the UK Green Party joins in the chorus of "racists and xenophobes!" against anyone who stands in the path of Big Business desires for the free movement of capital, labour and goods to enable the exploitation and destruction of every part of the globe.

You cannot be green and support population growth. The two are opposites.

The extent of humanity's effect on the environment makes you shiver in horror.


 Our species has halved the entire biomass of the globe:


Humans have reduced the global biomass of all wild land mammals to 15% of its pre-human level.   Sea mammals have been reduced to 20% of the pre-human level.  Humans have removed 50% of global fishery stocks.



See The biomass distribution on Earth
Yinon M. Bar-On, Rob Phillips, and Ron Milo
PNAS May 21, 2018. 201711842; published ahead of print May 21, 2018.

and Harvesting the Biosphere: The Human Impact

Note 1: Being green is not about global warming and saving humankind however, on the subject of Global warming, per capita CO2 emissions stabilised after 1970:


It is only population growth that led to the huge rises in total global CO2 in the later 20th century.  The growth of Chinese (and to a lesser extent Indian etc) emissions in the noughties increased global per capita output by 25% but even then, had global population stayed at the 1970 level there would have been no global warming.  From the green viewpoint global warming is not the issue, it is the gigantic footprint of humanity which has effects such as global warming, ocean pollution, habitat destruction etc. etc.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more