Skip to main content

US Investment banks are attacking the UK - why?

Everyone knows that Sterling is on a long term fall due to continuing balance of payments problems.  The green line in the graph below shows the Purchase Power Parity level of the pound (the level that would happen without currency speculation):


The UK Balance of Payments has been terrible for years due to membership of the Single Market:

See The Imbalance of UK-EU Trade..
This is causing a steady decline in the underlying value of the pound. As the OECD put it: "The current account deficit has reached 7% of GDP, the highest level on record, increasing vulnerabilities." Although the OECD avoided the obvious conclusion that the answer to the problem was to leave the Single Market. The pound is not sustainable within an EU Single Market that is dominated by the Euro (See The Imbalance of UK-EU Trade..).

On 7th October the pound was trading at near 1.24 dollars which is below the PPP value.  Given that the UK is likely to be leaving the Single Market and so will experience a recovery from the extraordinary Balance of Payments deficit it now looks like a good "buy" for any speculator who is not of a nervous disposition.

Those who take the long term view can see that the pound is actually stabilising after a long fall since 2014:


One disturbing aspect of the latest sell-off of the pound is that it is being orchestrated by the US Investment Banks who worked together to run the UK Remain campaign.  Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley etc. have mounted large scale publicity campaigns to suggest that the pound would fall massively and all provided huge funds to finance the Remain campaign in the UK.  The recent Flash Crash of the pound in the quiet hours of last night could have been a deliberate intervention to create a headline after Theresa May implied that the UK would leave the Single Market.  Flash crashes are artificial swings in market values that require a quiet moment in the markets and the sort of software and market knowledge that these Investment banks possess.

(See Funding of the StrongerIn Campaign, US Investment banks are running the campaign to get the UK into the Single Market. Such foreign involvement in national politics would not have been permitted in most countries and has been conveniently ignored by the broadcast media).

Of course, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley will all be buying futures ready for the return of the pound to PPP values having pushed the pound down with their concerted advice.

Goldman Sachs had a pivotal role in the Greek financial crisis and has appointed the retiring head of the EU Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, ex-EU Commission President as CEO of its International Division.

Goldman Sachs is particularly famous in the UK because it, and the other big US, "Stronger In" backer,  JP Morgan, precipitated Gordon Brown's give away of UK gold between 1999 and 2002. No-one knows why Brown rescued these US Banks with British taxpayer's money. We do know that Tony Blair retired into Directorship with JP Morgan which also involved huge consultancy fees.

There are strong hints here of the major banks attempting to control global politics for their own interests.  What is deeply suspicious is that the banks are now routinely offering large salaries and pay-offs to friendly politicians after they leave public life. "... Transparency International, the anti-corruption group, has highlighted the growing frequency of revolving-door moves. It cites US data showing that in the early 1970s, only 3 per cent of retiring senators went on to become lobbyists, whereas now the figure is close to 50 per cent." (Financial Times).


A Note on the Fall of the Pound

The fall in the pound is not due to Brexit, it has been happening for two years and ironically it is due to being a member of the EU.  It is impossible for the UK to keep the pound when almost all the other countries use the Euro:



(See The Imbalance of UK-EU Trade..).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...