Skip to main content

Public spending and GDP

The following chart shows how public spending varies with GDP in the UK:

Data slightly smoothed
The Labour governments of the 1970s massively increased public spending.  This was associated with a small decline in GDP and two fairly severe periods of low growth.

The Labour governments of the 60s and 70s had the sense to decrease spending when it was obvious that GDP was being adversely affected.  The 2005 Labour government was briefly cutting spending until Gordon Brown and Ed Balls took over.  Brown and Balls, from 2005 onwards, well before the world recession, decided to crash the economy.  They did this on purpose.

Their friends in the BBC are saying that we should have a "plan B" which involves increasing public spending massively.  They report on financial events by asking "is it time that the government 'stimulated the economy' by increasing public spending". Look at the data above.  What do you think will happen if public spending is increased?

It is obvious from the data that public spending should not exceed about 40% of GDP.

When public spending grows the private sector part of GDP declines (see Sydenham's Law of public expenditure and economic growth. ).  This means that increasing public spending is dangerous, it can cause a decline of economic activity and make us all poorer.  Whenever public spending is increased its effects must be carefully monitored.

If you do not believe that there are idealogues in the Labour Party who want to wreck Britain read: The Roots of New Labour.

The more numerate reader might have spotted that if GDP declines then public spending will automatically increase as a percent of GDP.  To analyse the effect of the public sector on the economy the changes in actual public spending (not % of GDP) must be compared with changes in the non-public sector.  When this is done we get Sydenham's Law: Increases in the public sector nearly always accompany decreases in private sector growth.  Notice in the graph below that except for Black Wednesday increased growth in public sector spending causes a decrease in private sector growth.  Public sector spending is what is known in business as an "overhead".

The most important lesson to be drawn from the past 50 years is that there is no evidence that increasing public spending increases private sector growth. This does not happen.



(Click on the graph to view full size).  Every time public sector spending goes up the private sector goes down, Keynesianism never happens, increased public sector spending never increases private sector growth.

Labour buys votes by overspending on the public sector and the media and electorate are daft enough to think you can do this with impunity.   The public sector does not trade.  The ideal level of public sector spending is around 40% of GDP, if this is not sufficient to provide the services and overheads that people want then the only solution is to increase GDP by increasing private sector growth.  There is no other way.  There is no magic porridge pot.

Be sure of one truth, Labour do not act in good faith.  Also be certain that the Tories do not act in good faith although their plans are better for the economy - but not society.

See

Sydenham's Law of public expenditure and economic growth.


Is Labour right?

Public spending and GDP

Is Labour any more than the Public Sector Party?

Does public money stimulate the economy?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...
35 comments
Read more

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...
49 comments
Read more

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...
15 comments
Read more