Skip to main content

Racist Social workers say UKIP members unfit to adopt children in Rotherham

British social workers?
A couple in Rotherham who are members of UKIP have had their foster children removed on political grounds.

Rotherham Borough Council's Strategic Director of Children and Young People's Services, Joyce Thacker said that the removal of the children was due to UKIP's policies on multiculturalism and, according to the couple, social workers have accused them of being racist (Daily Telegraph Article).

The real problem here is that the adoption laws and agencies are racist.  As Hayes (2012) remarks:

"The Adoption and Children Act 2002 requires that ‘due consideration’ is given to ethnicity in adoption placements. However, if too much consideration is given to ethnicity, then the obligation to give paramount consideration to the child’s welfare may be compromised."

If a council has racist social workers who believe that black children can only be reared in black families and white children in white families then  appalling decisions like those in Rotherham will occur.  This is Racism of the Second Kind - Internationalist Racism.

This racism amongst social workers is archaic and based upon a desire to ghettoise black people, allegedly for their own good.  But ghettoising black skinned people is a dreadful idea and inherently racist, it is also contrary to the nature of modern England.  According to Rees et al (2012) the population of the UK is already very diverse and becoming more so with 13% ethnic minorities in the UK in 2001 rising to 25% by 2050.   In England and especially in large English cities there is huge ethnic diversity with the whole spectrum of races occurring from black African through mixed race to white.  Furthermore about 28% of English children are born to immigrant families and the children of immigrants in English cities are no longer a small minority.

The racist social workers continue to discuss adoption in terms of polarising society into racially opposed groups, as  Griffith and Bergeron (2006) say:

"Transracial adoption (commonly understood as the adoption of black children by white families) has been the subject of a persistent debate among adoption specialists, legal advocates, mental health professionals, and even civil rights advocates in this country for a long time. This has been so despite cumulative research evidence indicating that transracial adoptees can thrive and develop into confident adults with strong senses of identity and self-esteem."

There is almost no empirical evidence that transracial adoption of children is more damaging than leaving them in Council "Care". As Rushton and Minnis (2000) say:

"the study broadly confirms the findings derived from other transracial samples that placement matching for race may not be the strongest predictor of outcome and that transracial placements do not necessarily preclude the achievement of a secure ethnic identity"

The lobby that is in favour of stopping transracial placement of children is the old enemy, the postmarxist sociologists.  The smoking gun that proves postmarxism in this recent case is that the children were of EU migrant background and so the classification of 'race' was based on the artificial division of people into opposing groups rather than ethnic properties. This vocal group of postmarxists is determined to create a racial divide wherever it can.  I have news for them: you are too late, England is diverse, in London at least we are getting on with being English rather than white and black. Multiculturalism is dying and people are becoming English.

Anyone who believes that black children can only be raised by black parents is not only denying all the empirical studies but is an outright racist.  The racist attitudes of Rotherham Social Services should be investigated and staff dismissed.

Returning to the "UKIP" couple, what could be less racist than inviting people of another race to share your family?  I am against mass immigration but deeply desire the English to accept each other and develop community, this couple seems to have the same view.  We are not racists, the postmarxist multiculturalists are the racists.  They believe in Apartheid because multiculturalism is separate development by another name.

Anyone who discriminates in the provision of public services on the basis of allegiance to a political party should be sacked.

http://tinyurl.com/qzasgdr

See

Is the pro-immigration lobby racist..

Multiculturalism 

Discrimination against conservatives in sociology and social science departments?

Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism



Hayes, P (2012) Giving Due Consideration to Ethnicity in Adoption Placements: A Principled Approach. Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 255-268, 2003


Rees, P., Wohland, P., Norman, P. and Boden P. (2012) Ethnic population projections for the UK, 2001–2051 Journal of Population Research Volume 29, Issue 1 , pp 45-89
"The ethnic minority share of the population increases from 13% (2001) to 25% in the trend projection but to only 20% under our modified emigration projection. However, what is certain is that the UK can look forward to be becoming a more diverse nation by mid-century.".

Griffith EE, Bergeron RL. Cultural stereotypes die hard: the case of transracial adoption. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):303-14.

Rushton, A. and Minnis, H. (2000). Research review: Transracial placements A commentary on a new adult outcome study. ADOPTION & FOSTERING VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 2000

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...
49 comments
Read more

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...
35 comments
Read more

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...
15 comments
Read more