Skip to main content

Is Internationalism the ultimate racism?


Do you believe that utopia will be a single world government of enlightened politicians that will bring peace to the world?  It might surprise you to discover that this Internationalist belief has serious problems.

Difference

Difference arises because people live in Sovereign Nations.  Centuries of separation have created a diversity of cultures and peoples.  Giving up sovereignty is giving up diversity.  Difference arises because people have stayed in their lands for hundreds of years.  They have lived sustainably.

Without Nations there will be no races, no Romanians, Hausa, Zulu, Irish and Germans. Supporting the destruction of diversity by encouraging the disappearance of Nations and Mass Migration is Racism of the Second Kind,  Internationalist Racism, the worst form of modern racism.

Racists of the second kind consider that it is more important to destroy racial difference than anything else.  They define themselves in terms of what they call their "anti-racism" and are against people who want the diversity of nations.

Sovereign Nations are the fundamental unit of human diversity.   Those who want the end of Sovereign Nations whether out of fear, such as fear of war and fear of difference or because they are Postmarxists, are racist.



Internationalism

Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dems are Internationalists.  They are working towards a world where Brussels, Beijing, Los Angeles and London are the same.  A world full of coffee coloured people singing the same song.

Much Internationalism is based on the fear of conflict due to the fear of diversity.  Internationalists are racists who want to destroy difference.

The final solution that the Internationalists will impose is Global Government.  When Global Government becomes corrupt or a tyranny there will be no Nations to resist it.   Humanity will enter a dark age.

The "Brotherhood of Man" must be based on mutual understanding, not grey uniformity and imposed equality.  Internationalism is a new Imperialism that will end in tyranny if it is not opposed, it is not the path to salvation.

We need German people and English people, it is racist to abolish both out of fear.  Stop war through mutual understanding not by abolishing all difference.

Internationalist Racism

Internationalists attack their enemies by declaring them to be racists but it is the Internationalists who are the ultimate racists.  Their aim is to destroy difference entirely. This is utter racism, racism of the second kind.  Without difference human society will be like a garden with only one crop, it will be unable to grow and blossom in a thousand ways.

Internationalists are engineering a "final solution" to the "problem" of diversity.  In their fear of conflict and fear of difference they are working towards this final solution with religious fervour, they must be stopped.

Opposing Racism

At every opportunity you should make it clear that you know that Internationalists are the worst racists in World History; that they are worse than the yob who wants to aggressively support his own race, they wish to destroy all races.  If they were to succeed there would be no races in the world, they would destroy all difference and create a social and cultural desert.

In the UK the opposition starts with opposing the EU.  The EU devours diversity.

Postmodernists love the EU
Opposition begins with the realisation that left wing groups always accuse their opponents of their own crimes.  This is a standard technique devised by Stalin and others - when they cry "racist!" it is to divert from their own racism.  Stop Euro Racism now.  When they cry "Nationalists start wars" they are diverting from "Ideologists, especially imperialists, start wars".  Stop Internationalism now.



Link to this article with: http://tinyurl.com/nctqauw

 Postmarxism and Internationalist Racism

Leninists, since the days of Comintern, and also Postmarxists, have considered global government to be the end point of revolutionary socialism.  These movements are particularly nasty because they believe that exacerbating racial tensions is a way of provoking revolutionary change.  Postmarxists see the separate development of races in the same country (multiculturalism) as part of the means of fostering violent revolution. Nations are the unit of diversity, not ghettos.

Also see Postmodernism-Poststructuralism-Postmarxism for a description of the political philosophy of the most active Internationalists.

Link in Twitter with http://tinyurl.com/nua33jm

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more