Skip to main content

When will the Eurozone Crisis end?

The Eurozone Crisis seems to be going on and on.  Recent remarks by Mervyn King just serve to underline the fact that the British press, banking and political classes seem to have no understanding of the issue.

Lets start at the beginning.  The Eurozone was a product of the Maastricht Treaty.  Our press covered this treaty as a few technicalities that Thatcher managed to resist but Maastricht was understood by all of the countries involved as the move towards European Union - a single European State.  British readers will "tut-tut" at this but please consider the following 1999 paper by the European Central Bank: Europe: Common Money - Political Union? before you tut-tut too much.

In this paper it says that:

"The monetary order established by the Maastricht Treaty with the detailed statute of the European System of Central Banks by itself represents an important building block for the development of a European statehood."

The importance of the connection between monetary union and the establishment of a single state was well understood at the new European Central Bank in 1999:

"So what does the future hold? Anyone who believes in the role of a single currency as a pace-setter in achieving political unity (Europe will be created by means of a single currency or not at all (Jacques Rueff 1950)) will regard the decisive step as has having already been taken. This does not provide an answer as to how the "rest" of the journey should be approached. "

The paper also foresees the current dilemma:

"There can be no turning back, as the failure of Monetary Union would not only be extremely costly from an economic point of view, but the political fallout would be unimaginable and would be tantamount to a catastrophe. The brightest and most respected former sceptics have conceded this much and now share the conviction that, once it has been set in motion, European Economic and Monetary Union must not fail."

So anyone who wonders why the Euro crisis is dragging on and on does not appreciate that the Europeans are playing for very high stakes indeed. (Click here for an insight into the German and Italian view of Europe.)

The crisis will drag on unless, as seems likely, Greece elects a government that absolutely refuses to accept the terms of the "bailout".   This will lead to the expulsion of Greece from the Eurozone although the Greeks will still be able to spend Euros in the same way as the Cubans use US Dollars as a currency. (Bizarre but true, Cubans spend US Dollars and do not have their own currency).

In many ways the expulsion of Greece will settle the Eurozone Crisis.  Italy and Spain will see what happens to Greece in the first couple of years after exit and will accept whatever the Germans tell them to do afterwards.

This brings us to the last problem: given that everyone in Europe understands that a single European State is being created why are our media telling us something different?   See The London Riots and the Mediocracy.

UPDATE by ECB on 20/07/2012

How does the European Central Bank see the crisis evolving? Here is an extract from an ECB approved presentation on the subject, Short Term Crisis Management and Long Term Vision, describing the 4 steps to a solution:
  1. The first is a financial union, with a single framework for supervising and resolving banks and for insuring customer deposits. This would build on the single supervisory mechanism now under development and ideally lead to a European version of the FDIC, financed by contributions from the private sector.
  2. The second building block is a fiscal union, with powers at the euro area level to prevent unsustainable fiscal policies and to limit national debt issuance. With these powers in place, a path towards common debt issuance would also be possible, but only at the end of the process.
  3. The third building block is an economic union, which would help euro area members to remain fit and to adjust flexibly within monetary union. This could entail, for example, moving from soft coordination of structural reforms in Member States to an enforceable framework at the euro area level.
  4. And the fourth building block is a political union, which aims at strengthening democratic participation. This final building block is equally important, as the other measures cannot be effective unless they are legitimate. This requires innovative thinking as regards the involvement of the European Parliament and national parliaments in decision-making on euro area issues.
It is clear that the EU sees the current crisis as a useful, continuous agitation towards political union.  It will not end until the EU is a single state.  This could take years.

See also:

The World Financial Crisis

On being "outside" in Europe. Isolated or free?

The Eurozone, EU, Cameron and Crisis

Globalization and Great Depressions
 
Europaische burgerkrieg anyone? The Germans lost the 'European Civil War' in 1945







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...