Skip to main content

Globalisation and Great Depressions

The Great Depression/1930s Depression had multiple causes and similar mistakes can be seen today. The biggest mistake was globalisation which removed the essential diversity of economies. A degree of separateness of economies means that one economy can fail without the rest collapsing. Diversity also means that nations do not mindlessly copy each others mistakes or, worse still, enter into international agreements to ensure that the mistakes are copied.

Globalisation

The economies of the late 1920s were highly globalised, perhaps more so than today.  After the Great War the banks were deregulated and this triggered the 1920s boom, as a result the money supply was taken out of the hands of the banks and controlled by a return to the gold standard. The gold standard was largely managed by Great Britain and the USA and conversion rates between currencies and gold were regulated. Large companies controlled shipping, mining and steel production on a global basis. Banks lent to each other across frontiers, secure in the gold standard. International trade was lubricated by export guarantees. The English language, Western dress, American films and western manufacturing and financial methods were spreading across the world. The European Empires ensured that this influence spread even to the furthest reaches of Africa, India and SE Asia. Vast steam ships ferried people and products to every corner of the globe. It was truly a new world order that was making everyone more prosperous. Money was flowing freely around the globe. The crazy Economists and newspaper pundits were extolling the virtues and inevitability of globalisation. Once everything had been become sufficiently interconnected and interdependent it was ready for collapse.

Did we learn from this? After the collapse of communism there was no longer any opposition to globalization. Global media corporations extiolled the virtues of corporate products to every corner of the world.  The crazy Economists and newspaper pundits were extolling the virtues and inevitability of globalisation and every country possible was roped into trading agreements. Once everything had been become sufficiently interconnected and interdependent it was ready for collapse.


The modern Sub Prime Crisis and Stock Market Collapse of 1929 

In the late 1920s banks loaned huge amounts of money for investments in the stock markets that fuelled the stock market booms. Eventually it was obvious that stocks were overvalued and the banks could no longer support their loans and called them in. Investors sold their shares to pay off their loans and stock markets across the world collapsed so the banks could not get their money back and some banks collapsed. Public confidence in banks fell and depositors withdrew their savings to invest in gold. This, coupled with a decline in interbank lending, put the banks under pressure and yet more banks collapsed. Did we learn from this? In modern times the banks lent huge sums of money on property investments, the properties became overvalued and some banks collapsed, interbank lending created a domino effect placing banks everywhere under stress. In both cases rash bank lending caused bank failure. There was also a considerable amount of white collar crime in both periods.

The Euro Zone and Gold Standard 

In the late 1920's most currencies in the world were backed by gold, each unit of currency being backed by a fixed amount of gold held as bullion. Some countries hoarded gold, especially France, and traded their goods at a discount. This led to an inflow of gold into France. Other countries experienced a gold shortage as a result and introduced austerity measures and raised interest rates to maintain the value of their currencies. Did we learn from this? This has echoes in the euro zone of today where the northern countries are producing large amounts of goods more cheaply than those in the south. Austerity measures and higher bond interest rates are required for these southern countries to obtain euros in the same way as they were needed for countries to obtain gold. Countries left the gold standard and eventually it was abandoned, this has not yet happened with the euro.

Recapitalisation of Banks 

The poor state of the banks in the early 1930s meant that they needed to be recapitalised. By the mid thirties banks had large reserves and were not lending, this restricted the supply of business and personal loans so led to decreased economic activity. Did we learn from this? In the early days of the modern sub-prime crisis banks were at first re-capitalised by governments but now they are being re-capitalised by ultra cautious lending as in the 1930s so hindering recovery.

Competitive devaluations and Tariffs

The fall in global trade in the 1930s depression was partly due to tariffs and competitive devaluations.  Contrary to the views of the Globalizing Tendency import tariffs can help national economies. It is when these get out of hand that world trade freezes up. In the modern crisis we are seeing competitive devaluations and may well see tariff barriers, hidden or otherwise.

Aftermath 

The economic aftermath of the 1930s Depression was bank regulation to stop the crazy backing of gambling by banks, the end of a single currency (the Gold Standard), and a return to tariffs and import controls to disconnect countries from international calamities. The social consequence of the 1930s Depression was private poverty and probably war. Did we learn from this? Over the past thirty years crazy economists and media pundits have extolled the virtues and inevitability of globalisation until everyone began to believe. Many of the errors of the 1920s have been repeated.

Globalisation is an obvious mistake, we can only have stability if there are many economies, each with some degree of independence, trading moderately with each other.

See also:

The advantages of globalization

Nations are the unit of diversity

The future of globalization

The aims of Localism

(See Lessons from the Great Depression. Economist Sept 2001,  although it is extraordinary that the author of this work considers that the ills caused by globalisation that caused its own demise were somehow an attack on globalisation.) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage