Skip to main content

Against racism

It is plainly absurd to discriminate between people on the basis of sun tan or the origin of a person's parents.

It is absurd that TV programs insist that the white male lead has a white female love interest and the black supporting actor has a black female.  And in the theatre Shakespeare should be performed by actors of any colour, black actors should not be relegated to playing Othello.  Historical dramas should have modern English people of all our shades of skin playing the parts.  Shakespeare and drama are about the soul not the skin.

It is also plainly absurd to prohibit people from criticising the cultures and religions of other people.  The concept of caste, female circumcision, the oppression of women, child sacrifice etc. are abominations that must be confronted in the UK.  Attempts to confuse culture with "race" are never without a *subversive intention such as to increase revolutionary tension or to prepare a nation for absorption into an empire such as the EU or Russia. To label opposition to such subversion as "racist" delivers these people their prize. (See Multiculturalism).  If a person says "the Lilliputians are hopeless, they are incapable of self government" this is a valid comment about systems of government and not racist.  Notice that I used "Lilliputians" and not a real country to avoid falling foul of the Equality Act 2010

It is also absurd to be pro-immigration because you are anti-racist.  Immigration is about economics, social provision and sustainability.  Those who are pro-immigration to "rub the nose of the right in diversity" are rotten at heart (see The Roots of New Labour).  Such people have not noticed that England is already very diverse and now they are playing with people's lives and possibly the very survival of the population of this country in the future to further their own dystopian, left-wing or post-modern, vision. (See Predicted population of Gt Britain).  Incidentally, if you are anti-immigration you have a democratic tool, just never vote Labour again, Labour set up the current mass migration in 1997 - just look at the migration graphs.

The extension of the idea of "racism" beyond passive characteristics is a deliberate ploy of Postmarxists.  The voting public have not been alerted to the way that postmarxists are now using the extended idea of racism to divide people into warring factions.

See:

Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism

Equality Act 2010 - read it and be afraid

*Subversion: where a group within a larger group supports the larger group but has undeclared motives and intentions that are against the interests or constitution of the larger group.  All human groups contain subversives and these sub-groups are often benign, but anti-democratic groups such as communists and post-Marxists are clearly dangerously subversive if they are hiding within a political party that has public policies that are not anti-democratic or are working in the media in a democratic country. 









Comments

peejay said…
You can, and probably will, delete me for being ''racist'' (such a convenient catch-all term), but it is not absurd to insist that Shakespeare has actors of the same race!
Do you really think Hamlet or Richard III could be played by black (or Asian)actors? So could Othello be played by a white person?
John said…
Shakespeare is performed in Tokyo, Lagos and New Delhi by local acting troupes. We are all the same beneath the skin. Some of us have been led astray like Macbeth, some of us are bitter and vengeful for the treatment we have received like Richard III, some on a cloud of young love like Juliet but these could be any of us, black or white.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...