Skip to main content

London Riots - What the hell did you expect?

Don't worry, the rioters hate the English as well, they just put their hatred into action, you do it by rejection...

I live near Croydon and my heart sinks as I see Reeve's Corner go up in flames. A decent family business run by decent local people and just look at it.

But what did you expect? I have seen Croydon go from a sleepy suburban centre into a place where no-one belongs. The rioters are people who do not care, like almost everyone else in London, they are not attached to their local community and culture, just to their local mates, their tribe. This does not excuse their reckless behaviour, they must be punished, but it means that other people should also be held to account, in particular the previous government that spent half a generation dividing and destroying society (the present government hasn't even got round to cutting the numbers of police in London as yet). It also means that you and I should re-assess the idea of creating numerous separate tribes in England. It is not holy to support the disintegration of a cohesive, civilised society, it is barbaric.

There is now very little effort to forge a single nation from England. Teachers and politicians have been avoiding the issue for at least a generation so that everyone has been badly brought up, rioters and those "Colonel Blimps" who condemn them alike. You can tell how badly brought up and educated you have been, most English people cringe if they are asked to stand up for England and the English, they have been taught to reject their own community. I bet you are cringeing now and searching for reasons why you should reject calls to support your fellow citizens and are coming up with reviled terms like "patriotism" and "nationalism" to excuse a rejection of your neighbours. Don't worry, the rioters hate the English as well, they just put their hatred into action, you do it by rejection... Most people who read this article will continue to cling to the current media driven ideas of globalization and the dismantlement of local identity and culture but they should not be surprised if riots and terrorism happen and their world shrinks to work, out of town shopping malls, telly and computer and your own little tribe. "Nationalism", yuk, how could I mention such a thing when multiculturalism (tribalism) is the future?

But if we were affectionate to our fellow countrymen we would be in favour of a single nation with a shared set of values. Our hearts would bleed for the poor, even if some of them have been criminal. |We would not simply scream condemnation like a set of Colonel Blimps. We would understand that the rioters have been raised rudderless and tribal, and now have every cause to despair. The youths here cannot afford to even get a driving licence at £4000 a shot for insurance. They can't afford to go to college. A huge number are out of work and facing a future where, without rich parents to buy you qualifications, you will never get a job: qualifications that were not necessary for the same job twenty years ago.

You can also tell how divided and how far we are from a single nation from the news, just look at the "Wombles", the clean up brigades and compare them with the rioters, there is a massive, visible difference of class and race, they are from different worlds without any comprehension of each other.

Politicians have filled the country with differences, put everyone in a straight-jacket of regulations and qualifications and then destroyed the economy by borrowing to the hilt. Are you surprised that it would result in the riots and disorder?

Just look at the TV and the newspapers tomorrow to see what happens when social cohesion is recklessly undermined. Read the rest of the articles on this website to see how the social breakdown behind these riots occurred.

Is there an answer? Yes, stop teachers from teaching disrespect, teach manners and civic pride instead, stop the influx of hundreds of thousands of people every year that undermine every effort to help the poor, make integrity the most important object of police training, stop the stratification of society by purchased qualifications, instill a sense of common purpose in children, proselytise against wealth and fame, wealth and fame are not career options, stop creating yobs, stop creating and importing people without any stake in society, stop despair ...

Unfortunately we will not get the right answer, the population seems hell bent on implementing the "holy" creed of multiculturalism yet will be blind to its effects and will blame the tribes that they create for their menace whether it be rioting or terrorism or ultra-nationalism.


See:

The roots of New Labour - a lot of people don't realise that Labour is a revolutionary party that desires polarisation as a necessary means to an end.
Immigration, house prices and boom economics - Brown's scam for massaging the economy for a few years.
The worst governments since the first world war - Major, Blair and Brown, the worst ever?
The benefits of immigration to the UK economy - none, really, none at all.
Its education stupid - class warfare in the classroom.
On being English - God help us.
Multiculturalism - believe it or not people think they are "holy" supporting the demon philosopher Derrida.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage