Skip to main content

On being English

The death of Arthur and Mordred Wikipedia
We English are experiencing a severe loss of cultural identity. The result of this is that English people have widely different values and some people even doubt whether England should continue to exist in the future.

There should be no mystery about this loss of an English cultural identity. It is obvious what caused it because when you look at almost any town in England there is an empty church at the centre. The church was the place where culture was spread to the general population and now few people go there. Things were very different a century ago when almost everyone went to church and most children attended a school that held religious assemblies. Religion was central to English culture.

The connection between the church and our culture is not surprising because there is a direct connection between culture, religion and myth. Myths and religions contain stories that describe the world in terms of what is significant and meaningful to people. For example in the tales of King Arthur the green land of England becomes connected with the story of Christ through the fate of the Holy Grail. The myth of Arthur reflects the desire that England should be God's own country.

The word 'myth' sounds very grand and distant but myths are not just stories from the past, they are created every day. A recent example is the way that Prime Minister Gordon Brown was portrayed as being a product of the church, a “Son of the Manse”, and so mythologised as the sort of good and godly man that we would prefer to see installed in the post of Prime Minister. This myth is about what we would like, not about the actual truth – Brown himself may be good or he may be bad but we would all like him to be good.

Myths and religion describe the world in terms of significance and meaning. They do not explain how the world works and so can seem to be silly stories. Some myths can seem mad but their significance is not at all crazy. As an example, the tale of Zeus transforming himself into a bull for the purpose of obtaining sex with Europa is obviously absurd but when we look at it from the viewpoint of an Ancient Greek it described how their land and lineage was connected to the gods themselves. The relationship between Zeus and Europa was about the significance of Greece to an Ancient Greek and wasn't really about bulls and sex at all.

Myths deal with meaning and could be dismissed except that outside of myth and religion there is no universally accepted answer to the question of why anything should be meaningful or significant for us. Attempts at mechanical answers, framed in terms of simple cause and effect or the survival of genes do not tell us why we should decide to do or be anything ourselves, now.

So what happened in England to change us from people with a fairly unified sense of purpose in life to a population with large numbers of people who feel lost? How did we lose our myths and religion? The answer lies in two World Wars and a church that portrayed God as a man in the sky who controlled everything. The independent spirited English realised that if God had caused all this suffering He could “f**k off ”. This was the right response because the Church had made a mistake. It had patronised a modern, educated community with myths for children. If there is a God He cannot be a man in the sky. God is about meaningfulness, not the mechanical control of our lives. If you cut your foot God didn't do it but when you are limping around days after the injury and your faith allows you to avoid despair then God may indeed be present.

This dissolution of national and moral purpose has let in the post-modernists who have been converting a vaguely structured society into an anarchy.

Where do we go from here? Does it even matter? Well, if you are, or have ever been, a parent or a teacher you know it matters. It must have been so much easier for teachers in the 1950s to control a class and for parents to instil morality in their kids when the whole of society sang the same tune about how we should behave towards each other. It must have also been much easier for politicians when there was widespread agreement about what type of policing and justice system should be used. Of course this shared culture had problems, it tended to be racist, xenophobic and supported an established order that was far from perfect but it definitely made people happier and society a safer place (recorded crime has increased 1000% since 1950 http://www.civitas.org.uk/data/recordedCrimePer100.htm ).

We have got ourselves into a right mess so how do we get out of it? The keys to this problem are held by government, schools and churches. Government should change the curriculum so that schools teach English history from a positive viewpoint where this is consonant with the truth (ie: the English abolished global slavery at huge cost and effort, not how England was a terrible slaving nation, how the British Empire was dismantled voluntarily, not how Britain suppressed the Mau Mau etc.). Cultures have “self esteem” like individuals and it is essential to stress how our culture has set an example in the world rather than how some actions of the British government were sometimes reprehensible. Most importantly the government should realise that, as an ex-imperial power, the British are painted as villainous in the national myths of scores of other countries and should combat this negative propaganda. Schools should hold assemblies that contain moral and cultural messages. The Church of England should be re-vitalised as a place for families and concentrate on the teachings of Jesus, playing down the childish myths. In particular people should be taught that "good works" are done with people you meet in the flesh, they are not performed by you if you are simply investing money in Christian aid businesses. Aid businesses should not be allowed in churches, they are not about Christianity itself and propagate the fatal message that "doing good" equals raising money.

Other religious faiths should be encouraged to describe their faith in an English context (ie: what it means to be a good English Hindu, Jew or Moslem etc.).

If governments protect and teach our culture then many other problems will be solved from lowering crime to reducing the suicide rate. After all, what is a civilised culture but the background that helps you declare that "I am English, I do not murder people, I am not racist, I believe in freedom, I believe civilisation is caring for others and enhancing our environment."

10/11/2008

Comments

Stephen Gash said…
The English have many enemies who are wolves in sheep's clothing. They are called the British.

The British installed a Welshman as Archbishop of Canterbury who zealously set about trying to remove all vestiges of Englishness from the Church of England. The Cross of St George was to be removed from English churches and England's Patron Saint, St George replaced with a plethora of regional saints.

The Church of England officially supports the regional carve-up of England.

The Church of England has become the Church of Anglophobia, under instruction from the British establishment.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage