Skip to main content

Ending lockdown is political

There are two views of politics.  In the first the People are born free and the State intervenes to prevent oppression by powerful individuals and groups.  The purpose of the State is to protect freedom and the individual.  In the second view people are born into service to society and the role of the State is to enrol the population into communitarian activity and behaviour and to permit "rights". The purpose of the State is to protect "society".

The release of the population from COVID restrictions is highlighting the difference between these ideas of politics.  Public sector workers such as academics and doctors conceive of any avoidable deaths as too many whereas those running businesses and those who desire to lead a full life believe that freedom will always entail a risk of death.

Even after widespread flu vaccination tens of thousands of people die annually from flu. COVID was worse than flu and very dangerous, lockdowns were justified, but now it is less dangerous than flu for those who are vaccinated. We do not and must not shut down our countries to avoid these deaths.

Part of being human is to sometimes suffer with illness and grief, everyone will eventually die.  Part of the frisson of any exciting activity is that it could go wrong: you could go broke, you could fall, you could lose your job, you could get lost etc. etc. Risk is an essential ingredient of being brave and free.

If, by July 2022 there have only been 10,000 deaths from COVID over the year the Government will have done the right thing by fully opening up.  Not that this will save them from the postmodern BBC which will make headlines out of almost any deaths from COVID whilst suppressing data on deaths in general - something must be done about the BBC.

There are four caveats to opening up fully.  The first is that the government should finance vaccines and drugs for variants that are escaping the vaccines and introduce booster shots to deal with these alongside the annual flu vaccination campaign. The second is that if the death rate from COVID is exceeding 100 deaths a day (30,000 a year) special measures may be needed.  The third is to issue clear guidance on how to avoid COVID and other respiratory infections for those who wish to protect themselves.  The fourth is to closely monitor "long COVID"/postcovid syndrome: is it very serious, does it mean that vaccinating children is essential?

5/7/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage