Skip to main content

Darwin, Lincoln, Churchill..why was the past racist?

If we probe almost any life story before 1900 we can find evidence of racist speech and publications.  The mass media are busy turning this fact into "horrified" coverage of individuals from history but is it moral to single out individuals?  Surely, if we wish to condemn, then all countries and tribes in the world should be condemned for their past beliefs rather than selected individuals. A cultural revolution against the past would be required, but should we really allow the philistines to mount a new cultural revolution against all of history like the Maoists of the 1960s?

Why were people racist in the past?  There are two main reasons for the racism of the past.  The first is that race is the result of racism. Our current races are a result of separate development in different countries and different parts of the world so that the existence of race is mostly a result of racism.  The second is that for almost two hundred years Europe was as different from tribal and less developed societies as aliens would be from humans today.  Europeans felt very superior; however, it must be remembered that the people who they felt to be above were also racists in their own ways so that they preserved their tribal and national identities.

I believe that the diversity of humanity is its greatest achievement.  If we use the postmodern definition of race to include both nations and cultures then the arts, customs and religions of our diverse races are extraordinary and wonderful.  This diversity is the result of the operation in the past of what would nowadays be called "racism".  Diversity needs separation so our current racial divisions are the result of people globally banning intermarriage with other races and even executing those who professed foreign ideas.

Diversity is our great achievement

Given that the intense racism that ruled before 1900 was everywhere, a global phenomenon, it is odd that the mass media does not mention this.  

The current campaigns against racism are also campaigns against the diversity of nations.  Being proud of your country means that you, personally, believe that your country is a better place to live than other countries so, according to the postmodern definition of race, being proud of your country is being racist.  This exposes the current postmodern/postmarxist/neo-Maoist politics of the mass media for what it is: an attack on the nation state.  These attacks are almost entirely a Western phenomenon and especially an Anglo-American phenomenon, linked to the relative decline of Anglo-American power.  The attacks are partly financed by enemies of the West who are secure in their racist, fortress states such as Russia and China, partly financed by multi-national corporations and partly financed by the postmodern state media such as the BBC whose staff were indoctrinated at university.

Those who dream of global dominion such as Trotskyists like Tony Blair, Internationalists like Tony Hall and Multinational Banks and Corporations etc. are using race to further their ideals.  But do we want a world where everyone shares the same culture, economy and laws?  Do we want a world without diversity?

In fact the question is outside of our own wants and desires.  Any biological system that lacks diversity is doomed.  It cannot adapt to change because it does not contain the diversity within it to cope with the change.  Imagine a world where all the land was used for farming wheat, eventually a crop disease or a climatic transient etc. will destroy the crop globally and cause disaster, eventually the lack of terrestrial carbon sinks would cause disaster and so on.  Uniform systems are prone to catastrophe. As recently as 2008 the global financial system collapsed because it was so interconnected yet the globalists suppress the fact that they were to blame by removing "barriers".

The most immediate catastrophe that will afflict a globalised world without diversity is that a total surveillance state will cover everyone to prevent terrorism from those who want their own religion, ideas or nations.  We have already seen this in China where, to control their hitherto diverse empire, the Chinese have crushed all difference with technology.

These are perilous times and the lack of a mature overview of race in our mainstream media is the principle peril.  Postmodern races are the result of diversity and the ultimate racism is to destroy the source of this difference.  The challenge facing us is to devise methods by which the diverse nations of the world can coexist in peace, not to be so afraid of difference that we create a new imperium to ensure control.

Postscript: Cultural Revolution favoured by idiot children? Taking the knee? Both are straight out of the Maoist politics of 1968 China. It is no coincidence that BLM stands for Black Liberation Movement, a Maoist organisation used by China.

.


Taking the knee?

9/5/2021

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more