Skip to main content

Are the Troubles Returning to Northern Ireland?

On the 23rd February, at the height of the transient post Brexit freight blockages between NI and the rest of the UK, the BBC reported loyalists saying that "There is "palpable anger" among unionists over the NI Protocol but loyalists are not thinking of a return to violence"  (BBC).  So why is there so much violence in April?

A young protestant man gave an interview on BBC television news yesterday where he said that the violence was not because of the border issues, it was because the loyalists felt defeated.  That Sinn Fein had won.  The BBC summarised this as the violence being about Brexit.  This despite the BBC itself having commissioned a poll that showed that 83% of NI voters did not believe Brexit affected their view of a United Ireland.

The broadcast media have been assiduously suppressing the truth about Northern Ireland.  This truth is very simple: according to the Belfast Agreement (Good Friday Agreement) and the Northern Ireland Act 1998 the moment that there is a workable majority for the secession of Ireland from the UK there must be a Referendum, a "border poll", to enable secession and the union of Ireland. It is the Sword of Damocles hanging over the head of every Unionist.

The view of Northern Ireland from England is largely "don't care" mixed with a substantial number of people who would just like to get rid of the whole Irish problem.

The Constitution Unit

The Republic of Ireland still strongly desire the annexation the North, with over 70% in favour and 57% would like a border poll as soon as possible.

The data on when there will be a secessionist majority in Northern Ireland is mixed.  On purely demographic grounds we would expect a majority this decade:

However Catholics are not uniformly against a devolved NI Assembly despite opposing being a part of the UK.

Institute for Government
The fact that the devolved government was in suspension between January 2017 and January 2020 due to internal disagreements was probably the main cause of loss of support for the Assembly, not Brexit.

Polls that ask the direct question about whether electors will vote for a united Ireland in a border poll are very mixed and unstable.

Constitution Unit 2020
As the suspension of the Assembly continued the vote for secession increased.  The Assembly is now reconvened but in relative turmoil and polls are still showing increased support for a United Ireland. 
Northern Slant

Again this shows very uneven poll results. The online polls showed much higher support for secession than the face to face polls.  The polls are also spread between 2016 (QUB) and 2019 (Ashcroft).  A recent update from Lucid Talk puts the figures at 42.3% pro-secession and 46.8% against. 

That the Protestants realize the tide of demography is against them is shown in this graphic.

The Unionists clearly feel they are losing.  And they are, according to the census data:

This change is reflected in the NI Assembly:

Which also explains why the Assembly collapsed in 2017.

The key to what will happen in NI is the Assembly.  If this becomes dominated by Nationalists then they will implement a pro-secession agenda and will, within 15 years, demand a border poll.  We have seen this in Scotland and cannot expect NI to differ.  Unlike Scotland, NI will be legally obliged to hold a Border Poll if it looks likely to support secession.  The next Assembly elections in 2022 will decide whether secession will occur in 15 years or 20 years.

When Labour implemented the Belfast Agreement in 1998 and gave NI away they knew that demography trumps democracy. When Labour implemented the Scottish Parliament in 1998 they knew that self government would eventually end in secession for Scotland.  In NI we have both demography and self government favouring secession.

9/3/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...