Skip to main content

The rise in reporting of sexual crime

 We are currently witnessing another media frenzy.  The media have moved from reporting the Maoist Black Liberation Movement (briefly called Black Lives Matter) to wall to wall coverage of sexual offences against women.

What are the real figures for sexual offences against women?  The latest statistical report is to be found in: Sexual offences in England and Wales: year ending March 2017.

The trend for sexual assault is downwards:

This data comes from the Crime Survey for England and Wales which involves reports from a large, random sample from the population.  The punch line of the survey is that "An estimated 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000) aged 16 to 59 experienced sexual assault in the last year, according to the year ending March 2017 CSEW; no significant change from the previous year’s survey."

Over the past twenty years there have been several initiatives to increase reporting of sexual crimes.  As can be seen from the survey there are a considerable number of sexual crimes and many of these were not being reported.   These initiatives have led to a very big increase in reporting:

It should be noted however that people have been encouraged by Operation Yewtree and other high profile investigations to report historical abuse.  About 33% of the reported offences were historical: "non-recent offences remain an important contributor to the latest rise in sexual offences (33%)" and very difficult to prosecute.

The Crime Survey for England and Wales contains this warning in bold letters for those analysing and reporting on sexual offences:

"Sexual offences and domestic abuse-related crimes recorded by the police do not provide a reliable measure of trends in these types of crime. Improvements in police recording practices and increased reporting by victims have contributed to increases in recent years, although this effect is thought to be diminishing. The figures do, however, provide a good measure of the crime-related demand on the police."

In the noughties rape was made an explicit crime within marriage.  This created a crime that can be reported but only prosecuted with extreme difficulty.  The law on rape within marriage was largely introduced in the hope of there being a deterrent effect because it was always appreciated that bringing a successful prosecution would be difficult.  The introduction of Tinder and other apps that encourage people to meet in private for sex also creates a problem for prosecutions.

Those prosecuting any offence know that if the case reduces to one person's word against another there is little chance of conviction. This probably partly explains why, during COVID, the conviction rate for rape has fallen as people are isolated indoors, away from witnesses:


Only about 14 women were murdered on the streets last year and the rate is not rising but the mass media are reporting the streets to be unsafe for women.

There are interesting parallels here between the recent BLM feeding frenzy in the media and the current frenzy over sexual assault.  In both racist and sexual incidents the actual level of crime has been falling but the level of reporting to the police has risen.  In both cases the reporting level has risen because the government and media have encouraged victims to report incidents to the police (See Hate Crime Figures).  In both cases journalists have seized on the increased reporting to create polarisation and damage to our society.

In particular the BBC is charged with introducing a higher level of analysis into its reporting but has failed miserably yet again.  They should have made it clear that there is little risk of murder or rape on the streets of Britain.  Something must be done about the BBC and Channel 4.

The real problem facing us is how to prevent journalists from seeking polarisation in every article and dramatists from endlessly portraying women as prey.  It is the mass media who are responsible for much of women's fear, even when they cover sexual assault they lie and twist the truth to exaggerate perceived risk in the hope of creating damage or excitement.  Any new BBC Charter should explicitly limit campaigning activity, the National Broadcaster cannot both campaign and be objective and impartial.

16/3/2021


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage