Skip to main content

Dead Horse Exposes Dying Society?

As a teenager I used to work on local farms, mucking out stalls with a pitch fork and wheelbarrow.  It was a long cycle ride but good work.  I remember dead milking cows being winched onto the back of the local hunt's lorry so they could be fed to the dogs. I even used to wrestle young bullocks to the ground for veterinary inspections.

According to the modern media morality most of this is shockingly immoral.  We are so much better people now that we would never fight bullocks or be so disrespectful to a venerable old, and beloved cow that it would be winched, spinning onto a lorry.  We would never sit on the back of a dead animal like the hapless Mr Elliot.

Daily Mail

We are so much more advanced than our predecessors that we put our cattle and pigs into massive barns so that they never see the real daylight or smell the open air.  Our cows wander through automated milking parlours. We crop our fields to supply feed because it yields more cattle growth and milk yield per acre than letting the animals feed naturally.  The insects and worms have left the fields along with the cattle and the countryside is strangely silent as the birds retreat to back gardens to make a living.  Our towns are endlessly expanding over the greenness.  Vegans yearn for the day when all livestock are dead.  Yet we tell ourselves that we are morally superior to the hard hearted animal trainer and other survivors of the agricultural past.

We sit in front of the modern Panopticon of the media and await moral judgement on the events of the day.  If the media sharks begin feeding ferociously we send each other whatsapps and instagrams so that we can feel part of the morally superior society.

But in truth we have no morals.  Our displays of goodness are often no more than agreeing with a transient media consensus.  The great achievement of Western society is to have liberated moral condemnation from any defensible morality. 

Our morale slides with our morality.  Demoralised, a fifth of the population is suffering mental illness (in 2021 nearer 25%).  
Parliamentary Briefing

It seems that the spurious "moral" condemnation of others according to the latest fashion and the lack of clear ideas of how to live is actually worse for the mental well being of the people than Islam or Christianity.

Thirty years ago the West was relatively free from the random "morality" of the media and was the envy of the world.  Now our enemies across the world gain strength from believing that although they deny their people freedom they are not "disgusting" like the West.  Their morale grows as we display our moral confusion.  Most of our enemies, except for a few Westernised academics and students, now believe that the Western approach to life is no longer such an attractive choice except to earn money.  Had the Soviet Union survived another forty years it would not have fallen.  This should worry us.

It seems that those who lose their gods, whether these are Yahweh or Marx, will eventually lose their society because religions are a way of life and a prescribed way of life is a religion. 

However, as we can see from Iran, a prescribed way of life is not always an answer although it provides cohesion against the odds.    

For myself I would prefer a society where people are free and can very largely say and behave as they wish, within a libertarian legal code, without either proselytising or moral condemnation.  If a dopey little man wants to sit on a dead horse, let him.  Unfortunately the tolerant spirit of the age of the hippies is almost extinct.

Will the desire for moral condemnation lead us back to a prescribed way of life or polarise society into self-destruction or neither?  These are interesting times.

2/3/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...