Skip to main content

The causes of global warming and global instability

There are four powerful political forces in the world today: multinational business, internationalist socialism, international evangelism and nationalism.  It is the first three of these that are having a devastating effect.

The global ecological crisis is largely due to multinational business.  Without our massive trade beyond our borders we would be constrained by the resources of our respective countries.  As countries increase industrial activity they also increase their populations and, without excessive international trade, will reach a limit to growth.  It is the consumption of resources in excess of those that are locally available that is the cause of the global ecological crisis, whether that crisis is manifest as species extinction, overpopulation or global warming.

The global Islamist and terrorist threat is due to international evangelism.  Sects such as Wahabism have grown strong in countries like Saudi Arabia which are rich as a result of international trading.  The evangelists of Saudi Arabia etc. have made large financial investments in other Islamic countries and spread the creed.  Extremists have taken the evangelism into fanaticism and terrorism.

The Internationalist Socialists (largely Trotskyists and fellow travellers) have infiltrated educational, trade union and media platforms to promulgate a doctrine of global government.  The "National" Socialists such as modern China and Russia are applying pressure to expand their borders by wealth and force.

The modern nationalists such as the UK, USA, Switzerland, Norway etc. are on the back foot because they are under pressure from all of the Internationalist groups.

Most of the Internationalist groups sell themselves by declaring that they support openness, global cooperation, love and peace.  The internationalist socialists have a strong network in education and the media and are selling this message with almost religious fervour.  We should all know that a globe controlled by Big Business, Trotskyists or Religious extremists will be an absolute nightmare so why are so many students and middle class dilettantes taken in by this message?  Ignorance. This is how the Internationalists dream of the world:

The Globalist's Dream

The wonder of the world and of humanity lies in its diversity:

UK, China, Iran, Tyrol, Colombia, Austria
Internationalism is a pernicious form of childish racism, it holds that we are all really the same and should live as one.  This is utterly wrong.  We should be teaching our children to respect diversity, not to abhor it.  We should rejoice in difference. Cultural diversity is the jewel in the crown of humanity.

How do we ensure diversity?  The first, crucial step is to acknowledge that Nations are inherently a good idea.  They are not the source of the world's problems.  Historically it was those who wished to conquer others who caused the problems and today it is the globalists and internationalists who wish for a uniform world.  In truth the globalists and internationalists are just another type of imperialist.

Nations are economic units that govern themselves.  They are hated by globalists because part of being an economic unit with independent government is to have borders and borders obstruct multinational business.  Diversity can only flower within borders.  Sustainability is only possible within borders.  Moderate Nationalism is only a "dirty word" to racist internationalists, in contrast decent people support their neighbours.

Having secured its borders a sustainable nation will eventually need to include its natural environment in its national accounts as a nearly priceless asset.  If it builds over every acre of land it will not be sustainable.  It must limit its population so it does not exceed the sustainable capacity of its land.  It will also need to ensure that its international trade is balanced and moderate, if it trades at a deficit for decades it will eventually fail and become a poverty stricken disaster. 

Nations need to be considered as a special sort of corporation, a large company of people that tends its land and works together to make a good living wage for everyone.  It is in competition with multinational corporations and should be keenly aware of that fact.  The multinationals are governed by the whims of a small, unelected board of privileged people whereas many nations are able to respond to the needs of their workforce through democratic institutions.  Understanding the competition between the nation and the internationalists is the first step to survival.  If the internationalists are allowed to subvert the media and education system the nation will be threatened.  

The internationalist socialists are perhaps worse than the multinationals, they believe that it is only once the world is subject to global government that they will be able to seize power and subject us all to the sort of tyranny that communism demonstrated in the twentieth century. Communism on a global scale would have no nations to oppose it.

How it has come to pass that children are raised to believe that global government is the answer to the world's problems is a mystery.  It was the post WWII internationalist order that unleashed the multinationals on the world to exploit its every resource, it is the expansionary religious zealots who are causing many of the conflicts and the internationalist socialists who have blighted the world from Chernobyl and the Aral Sea to the Yangtse and Mekong Dams.

2/2/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome