Skip to main content

No Platforming: The BBC is also Guilty

The Culture Secretary, Oliver Dowden, is considering appointing a "Free Speech Champion" and introducing fines for universities that "no-platform" speakers.  This is excellent news.  We can tell it is a move in the right direction because the Guardian ran a comment piece criticising it.

No-platforming at universities by students is just the most public example of suppressing free speech.  No platforming happens wherever people intend indoctrination rather than education.  The most egregious example of no-platforming in universities is in the Humanities where publishing and appointing staff who have centrist or right of centre views has been terminated. (See UK Universities Bar Conservative Voters from an Academic Career for data).

The most dangerous example of no-platforming is the BBC and Channel 4, both of which have a legal duty to be impartial but both routinely no-platform any views that their staff dislike and produce news and drama that is polemical in its support of a narrow band of postmodern views.

It is essential that the Conservatives use this period of government to implement Equality legislation in university recruitment and so stop discrimination on grounds of belief**.  It is also necessary to ensure that Channel 4 and the BBC are not routinely biased.  In particular the BBC Charter should be amended to forbid the suppression of news that the staff dislike (no-platforming) and amended to limit the amount of anecdotal reporting so that interviews and panels do not oppose professors to drunkards to create bias.  

The staff in both the BBC and Channel 4 have become composed of privileged humanities graduates and recruitment policies are no-platforming journalists from other media sources such as the Telegraph, Mail etc.  These state supported broadcasters should be able to demonstrate firstly that they have a diversity of political outlook and secondly that they comply with rules on gender and ethnicity.


** The easiest way to stop discrimination in the humanities would be to establish independent units in university departments across the country, using funds from existing departments to finance them.

Also see: Why BBC Presenters and Journalists Must be Changed.

The BBC "no-platforming" manifests as the suppression of news items.  A recent example is the failure to note that the WHO spokesperson, Dr Daszak, who declared that a lab escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology was very unlikely, was the man who financed and participated in experiments at the laboratory and could have been personally responsible for any lack of biosafety.  Another example is the utter suppression of the UK-EU Trade figures to this day - see ONS figures for UK-EU Trade Balance

16/2/2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...