Skip to main content

What is the Evidence for Electoral Fraud in the USA?

I am happy that it looks like Biden will be the US President.  Biden will be good for the UK and Trump let down a large section of US society that desperately needed a representative who was presidential rather than a game show host. (See Biden to Win US Election. What then? for why Biden will be good for the UK).

That said I was greatly disturbed by the abrupt slowing of vote counting in the "swing states" which was accompanied by the sudden appearance of large numbers of Biden votes.  I noticed this because I was calculating how far the remaining vote would need to swing to Biden for him to win.  A Biden win looked almost impossible on the Wednesday morning because in most of the swing states over 90% of the vote had been counted and Biden would have needed about 70% of the remaining votes to win. This seemingly impossible change to Biden having 70% of the vote when he was behind was why Trump declared victory and is the only real reason for doubting the election result.

Buzzfeed has a summary of the various allegations of Electoral Fraud and tampering. This summary is generally credible and none of the accusations of tampering except the sudden increase in Biden votes would really have swung the election even had they happened.

It is only events such as this:


in which the Biden vote increased massively and the Trump vote did not change at all, being stuck at 2,200,902, that are worrying.  The explanation according to Buzzfeed was:

"The influx of 138,339 Biden votes cited in some tweets was the result of a data error, according to a spokesperson for Decision Desk HQ, an election data and analysis service.

It was a simple error from a file created by the state that we ingested,”

The “It was a simple error from a file created by the state that we ingested,” seems vague at best.  If it was an error why wasn't it removed? Obviously the spokesman did not mean "error".   My guess is that the Biden votes had indeed been validly cast because there were large numbers of observers at the vote counting.  However, the influx of enough votes to almost demolish Trump's lead in Michigan being the result of an "error" needs a full explanation, not a vague denial of wrong doing.

After the morning of November 4th it turned out that not only did Biden get the necessary 70% of remaining votes but some of the changes in the announced vote counts were nearly 100% for Biden.

Ultimately it is going to be very difficult to prove that the postal votes involved fraud.  A significant fraction of the postal voters in the swing states would need to be interviewed and the Biden-to-Trump voting ratios compared with those in the actual postal ballots.  Other possibilities such as intimidation of postal voters are almost impossible to prove because it is one person's word against another's.

What seems clear is that the Democrats were much better at getting out the postal vote than the Republicans and that, because postal voting is not a secret ballot, they could ensure that mainly Democrat votes were solicited.   If there is a problem with the result of the US Presidential Election it is postal voting.  This is an important lesson for governments across the world.


9/11/2020

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome