Politics is Polarised. Why?

The media is full of journalists saying that politics has become polarised. The coverage of the US election has even involved extensive coverage of the possibility that one side or the other might refuse to accept the result, that there might be demonstrations, violence and even a coup. How exciting!

How did the orderly and slightly boring process of elections become exciting? The answer is simple, the elections are much as they have always been but 24 hour News has appeared and this needs to grow its ratings every year. As early as 1999, right at the beginning of 24 hour News, people were noticing that the press was replacing the traditional values of verification, proportion, relevance, depth and quality of interpretation with sensationalism, entertainment and opinion. (See for instance Kovach and Rosenstiel 1999, Warp Speed: America in the Age of Mixed Media).

The ultimate objective of 24 hour News is to immerse the audience so that they are watching the News all day long and become extras in an all absorbing fiction about the world.

The worst offender in the UK is the BBC. Under the leadership of figures such as Sopel, Maitliss, Robinson and Kuenssberg the presentation of News has become a "speech and drama" event in which the presenters vie with each other to squeeze every ounce of despair and pathos out of any report. They have become performers in the global tragedy that they are producing. As part of this performance they turn every story into a battle, pitting young against old, north against south, black against white.

The mainstream News Media are obviously becoming extremely bad for the stability and democracy in a country. It should always have been the role of government to regulate the Media so that this did not happen. The Media has resisted this regulation because although in many ways it is just another industry it carries the publicity for politicians and this gives the Media power.

What can we do? The BBC is the worst offender and easiest to control. The BBC Charter should be amended to prevent polarisation, whether this polarisation is accomplished by suppressing facts, selecting extreme interviewees, selecting extremists to sit on political panels or simply reporting events as a battle of extremes.

3/11/2020

Comments

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith. What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas? In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata. The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile. In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics. Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka? Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women? Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism? I hope to answer these questions in this article. I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

Political Thoughts - the magazine

Search This Blog