Skip to main content

The Future of the United Kingdom

There is pressure for independence in Ireland and in Scotland and a radical redrawing of Parliamentary Constituency boundaries is in progress.   What will the UK look like in ten years time? 

The Parliamentary Constituences Bill 2020-21 is about to become law.  This allows the Boundary Commissions to produce a map of Constituency boundaries every eight years, the first set of changes will be ready for the 2024 election.  This boundary review is overdue and might have been implemented in 2016 had the EU Referendum not thrown UK politics into disarray.  The 650 new constituencies will have about 70,000 voters in each.   The previous boundaries gave Labour a considerable advantage in elections because they included many small, urban constituences; when this unfairness is corrected the new boundaries are likely to give the Conservatives about 21 extra seats.

The Good Friday Agreement states clearly that when a majority in Northern Ireland favour Irish unification there should be a Referendum called a Border Poll. Michael Martin, the Taoiseach of the Republic of Ireland, has recently stated that there will be no Border Poll in Northern Ireland for five years.  This makes sense because at present there are equal numbers in the North for and against the unification of Ireland.  There are more people of Catholic affiliation among the young and these also have pro-EU views so the demography inexorably favours unification. Given current trends there will be a clear majority for Irish unification after 2025.

Scottish nationalism is on the rise. It has been blamed on the vote for British independence in the EU Referendum but the roots are far older.  The Scottish electorate are mostly communitarian and voted socialist before they began to support the SNP in large numbers.  England has a large libertarian population and this political difference between England and Scotland has always been a source of disagreement.  The Scottish support for the EU was just the latest example of this deep seated divide. The opinion polls are now showing clear support for independence:

Source: Wikipedia summary

The present UK Government has ruled out any Scottish Independence Referendum but after 2024 the pressure will grow if the SNP continue to be dominant in Scotland and if the opinion polls continue to favour Scottish Independence.

Very few countries voluntarily disintegrate and most have laws that treat secession as treason. The UK has permitted this disintegration partly as a result of the committment of its Corporate Elite to the EU ("we will all be regions of the EU in 20 years time") and partly as a result of the libertarian politics of England ("if they want to go they can go"). 

The next election in 2024 will focus on these issues.  The Boundary Commission changes may well give the Conservatives another majority but this will have no effect on the position in Northern Ireland.  The current UK Government might factor-in the loss of Northern Ireland in any negotiations with the EU.  Another Conservative Government in 2024 will affect Scotland which will then need to wait until 2028-29 until any Referendum and no-one can really foresee what will occur in 2030 or later.


23/10/2020


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome