Skip to main content

Earthshot - who should get the prizes?

David Attenborough and Prince William have just announced the Earthshot Prizes of £1 million each, five times a year.  Who should get them?

The prizes are for solutions to the current global ecological crisis.  The ecological crisis is the disappearance of uninhabited and natural land, the huge decrease in wildlife numbers, the pollution of the environment and climate change. It is neatly summarised in this graphic:

Data source: Smil 2011

 What has caused this effect of humanity?  It is population growth:

Population Matters

Humans have reduced the global biomass of all wild land mammals to 15% of its pre-human level.   Sea mammals have been reduced to 20% of the pre-human level.  Humans have removed 50% of global fishery stocks.

Source: Smil (2011)

This loss of wild life is far worse than Climate Change at the moment but if Climate Change continues unabated it will get worse.

 Climate change is mostly due to population growth:

 Indeed CO2 emissions per person stabilised between 1970 and 2002.  It was purely population growth that was pushing up CO2 until China, India and much of the world became developed after 2000 and increased emissions per head by a further 20%:


What can we do to reverse this crisis?  The crisis is caused by population growth and a development model promulgated by the World Bank, IMF, WTO etc. that is energy intensive and encourages population growth.  If the prizes are to have any real impact they will need to be awarded first and foremost to those who propose measures that are likely to control population growth and secondarily to those who propose schemes for green energy etc.

The effects of stopping population growth in developed countries are much larger than they appear at first sight:

See Population Matters


Having one less child is 25 times more effective than foregoing the use of a car because each child, on average, gives rise to an entire line of extra people.  Developed countries are the worst CO2 emitters:

No developed country should have an expanding population.  The worst offenders for population growth in developed countries, such as the UK, should be ashamed of themselves and cannot begin to tackle the crisis until they have controlled their population growth.

The worst outcome of this crisis will be humanity holed up in "Green" megacities with nature in wildlife parks between thousands of square kilometres of agridesert. Those who propose such solutions should be treated for mental illness rather than given prizes.

 

A mobile friendly version of this article can be found at: There and Where: The Earthshot Prize .

8/10/2020

See The biomass distribution on Earth
Yinon M. Bar-On, Rob Phillips, and Ron Milo
PNAS May 21, 2018. 201711842; published ahead of print May 21, 2018.
  Population and development Review 37(4): 613–636 (december 2011)

and Vaclav Smil Harvesting the Biosphere: The Human Impact Population and Development Review 37(4): 613–636 (December 2011)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...