Skip to main content

How to destroy the UK and how to stop that happening

A nation exists where economic geography and history has led the people who occupy an area of land to create an independent economy, culture, legal system and politics. 

If you wish to destroy a nation you cannot do so by simply invading it.  The moment the troops are withdrawn it will come back again.  To destroy a nation it is necessary to remove control of the national economy, change its legal system and most importantly destroy its culture. China has been at the forefront of schemes to destroy nations.

The ultimate solution adopted by China to destroy the Uighurs and Tibetans is to move millions of Han Chinese into Uighur and Tibetan territories, to destroy all statues and buildings that remind people of their origins, to rewrite their history so that China is the hero and Muslims/Buddhists are the villains and to disperse the local population across the whole of China.  Any remaining clinging to nationhood can be dealt with by the summary execution of racist ringleaders who speak out against the Han or China.  The final step is to establish concentration camps for the remnants of the previous population. The whole operation is covered by the thoroughly modern justification of rooting out racists and religious extremists.

How would you destroy the United Kingdom?  Given that it is not easy to invade the UK your first step would be to divide it into competing parts with their own governments and racial identity whilst leaving the bulk of the people, the English, unrepresented.  England is then at your mercy because it is gagged and the other "states" can treat it as a punchbag, the result is almost as good as an invasion.  The next step is to establish a vast pool of people in the country, like China established the Han in the Uighur Empire or Tibet, who do not owe any communal allegiance to England.  Next destroy all the statues and buildings that remind people of their origin. Rewrite history so that the English are always the villains.  Anyone speaking out against the changes would be classified as a racist and extremist and vilified and silenced.  They could even be forced to kneel in public in repentance and obeisance.  Most people can be forced into conformity by public and group pressure.
Kneeling in the Cultural Revolution
The most extreme opponents would be tried by tribunal and locked away as terrorists.  Ideally you would attach England to a large empire and try to encourage as many people as possible to move out of England whilst replacing them with people from the Empire.

That is how you would destroy the UK using the Chinese model.

The modern Chinese model is extremely effective because of continuous and deep surveillance.  If a Uighur were to use their smartphone to access a book that offended the government they would be spotted by AIs and "shadow banned" (demoted, unable to get loans or employment) or arrested.  If you wanted to implement the Chinese model to destroy the UK you would pass shadow banning legislation such that any dubious comments on social media etc. would prevent people from being employed, especially in the public sector.

But who would want to do such a thing and why?

Surprisingly there are people who would like to terminate the UK to such an extent that it would just become a region of a neighbouring state, like Tibet in China.  If we are to save our country it is probably a good idea to ensure that these people do not occupy senior positions that allow them to operate the Chinese model of destroying a nation. 

We can resist the attacks.  Most importantly our education system should train our children in the abundant positive aspects of British history such as the Magna Carta, Protestantism (esp Lollardy), the Bill of Rights, science and the Enlightenment, suffrage, and the defeat of national socialism and global communism.

The education system should not focus on a list of apparent historical wrongs committed by England.  The only conceivable purpose of such a course would be to undermine the nation.  Apparent historical wrongs should be taught in context so that children can understand that hundreds of years ago the whole world was committing these wrongs.

Employment in the state sector of the Broadcast Media should involve screening to ensure that employees are not devoted to the destruction of their own country. The employment of such people would, of course, aid the destruction of the nation and cannot be justified by a state broadcaster.

Those who wish to terminate our country are in two groups, the Far Left and the Globalists.  The Far Left Maoists and Trotskyists are just lost souls sucked into an evil political community.  The Globalists however are different and more dangerous. 

The centre of globalism is a large group of privileged people who float across the surface of the westernised world using the facilities provided by the settled people to their advantage.  They will work in the USA but return to the UK for their free medical care.  Many may have adopted dual nationality so that, for instance, being Irish they could get their children educated for free at Scottish universities and being British they could enjoy the employment opportunities of the City of London, or they could play off one country's tax system against another.

There is yet another, larger set of Globalists who have been left behind by global events.  They imagined that Anglo-American hegemony (The West) was a permanent fixture in global politics and have not understood that this has passed.  They believed and still believe that the Western model of society will conquer the world.  If it were not for their utter control of the media we would have learnt that China and Russia are Nazi (National Socialist) superpowers which now pose a threat that is greater than that of the Communists in the past.  We would have been acutely aware that Pakistan, India and Israel are nuclear powers with no interest in giving up their independence.  We would have understood that nations that were once "developing nations" like Thailand are now developed and want to stay independent.  Brexit and Trump are symptoms of these changes, they are the result of democracies reacting to the changed World Order, they are not the cause of the changes.

The UK and USA can no longer police the world.  They cannot contain China.  They cannot intervene in South Asia. They withdrew most of the hundreds of thousands of troops from Germany in the 1990s and we can only hold our breath as the EU develops now it is released from control by the West. Never has the UN been so needed but it is falling under Chinese influence.  The UK needs to re-assert its ties with its friends and take great care not to be dependent on its enemies or fair weather friends.

The globalists who are unaware of how the world has changed should learn that it only took Germany six years to go from basket case in 1933 to world threatening superpower in 1939.

The West took a wrong turn in the 1990s.  Instead of seeing the fall of communism as an opportunity for guaranteeing the independence and security of nation states (see Note) it pressed ahead with a globalization agenda.  This wrong turn has jeopardised the security of us all.

8/7/2020

Note: The absolute, global guarantee of security for nations is the foundation for world peace.  It is world peace.  Globalization caused Islamic terrorism and Globalization is the foundation for world war as it attacks the fabric of nations.

Had all nations of the world formed a military alliance in 1989 with the sole objective of guaranteeing the independence and security of nations, as stated in the UN Charter, world history would have been very different. 

In the early 1990s this guarantee might have been possible.  The newly liberated states of the Russian Empire (USSR), including Russia, would have been extremely keen to sign up to a strong guarantee of security. India and Pakistan were relatively friendly and Pakistan still lacked nuclear weapons.  China accepted that it did not have the power to invade Taiwan.  I can see little chance of any such guarantee being accepted now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome