Skip to main content

What is China's Plan?

Various small clashes over the past year culminated in a fairly large scale skirmish on Monday in Ladakh that left 20 Indian soldiers dead and killed at least that many Chinese troops (Indian Times). It is less than a week since China seized 60 square km of Indian land in the Himalayas (Telegraph), an "invasion" that was supported by 12000 Chinese troops.

China has increased its harassment of Taiwan by sending fighters into Taiwanese airspace, has annexed Hong Kong, and has allowed its client state, N.Korea, to increase tensions with the South by blowing up a liaison office on the border. It is heavily reinforcing the border with India and allowed COVID19 to spread globally.  China is on the move.

The immediate Chinese objectives are to annex the South China Sea, which is claimed by Vietnam and others, to conquer Taiwan and extend its power with the Belt and Road strategy.

How are the Chinese actions linked to their objectives?

The Chinese claims in the South China Sea are often glossed over by the UK Broadcast Media as of little consequence but they are a major play to control the ocean in South East Asia:
Wikipedia Chinese territorial claim edged in red

The world would be foolish to permit this control and could only construe it as the first move of wider territorial ambitions.  It also sets an appalling example for other States with territorial ambitions.
Defense News:Huge Chinese Military Base on Spratly Islands
The Subi Reef military base on the Spratly Islands (above) is in waters that are disputed by Vietnam and the Philippines.

The Chinese actions in the Himalayas are linked to its recent alliance with Pakistan. China appears to be building a major military base at Jiwani on the Indian Ocean (Washington Post).  The ultimate objective of the Chinese-Indian skirmishes is most likely the need to build communication links through Kashmir as part of the Chinese "Belt and Road" initiative.  The current road from China to Pakistan over the Karakoram (and onwards) is subject to landslides and can be closed for the winter.

The Chinese Objective?
The new link would be only 300 km long. China is building a rail link that looks like it could be directed at Ladakh.


China is absolutely implacable in its claim over Taiwan. There can be little doubt that this will result in conflict over the next 50 years.

So what is going to happen?

China is pumping arms into Pakistan which has equipped it for another war over Kashmir.  It is possible that China is unbalancing Indian forces in Kashmir by drawing them to Ladakh on the Eastern border.  If this is the case expect a Pakistani attack in the West. Or they may just be testing Indian military reactions for a future war.

China cannot expect an easy victory in the South China Sea or Taiwan.  It needs a diversion.  My guess is that it will instruct N. Korea to mount a nuclear attack on S. Korea with the expectation that the USA will intervene with nuclear weapons.  In the ensuing chaos and universal condemnation of the USA it will move forward in the South China Sea.  This sounds plausible but the outcome is insufficiently guaranteed for China.  How will they do it?

Certainly UK Broadcasters, especially the BBC, will cover up what is happening until it is all too late.  The refrain will be "nobody told us about China".

Yet there are some brave BBC correspondents:



Chilling echoes above of the guided tours of camps for Jews in Germany in the late 1930s.  China is now National Socialist, not communist.
17/6/202

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H...

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone po...