Skip to main content

Anti-Racism or Let them Eat Cake? The undeserving poor in 2020.

The most famous example of the disconnect between the upper and lower classes in a society is when Marie Antoinette, in response to being told that the starving poor had no bread, is alleged to have said:  "let them eat brioche".  Whether this really happened or not many of us know upper class people who could easily say such things.

In the UK today there are food banks so we really can say "let them eat tinned peaches".  But rather than being satisfied with the possibility that starvation can be averted in the UK we should be worried.  There had not been food need in the UK for at least 50 years before the Great Recession of 2008.

The lower classes are an eyesore for the upper classes.  Only last weekend I sold a rowing boat and one of the families who came to buy it was a picture.  The father had tattoos all over his arms and the mother looked like she could deliver a nasty uppercut if you offended her.  I could imagine my upper class neighbours raising eyebrows.  The grandmother had skin like tanned leather and between coughs provoked by the cigarette stuck to her lower lip chatted about other boats she had had.  They knocked the price down a bit but I sold the boat to them because they knew about boats and I could see that it would go to a good home.  Being upper class it also saved me getting up early on Sunday for another round of sales.  I was born among people like them.  The mother reminded me of girls I had known.

My upper class friends and neighbours never talk about the lower classes but they are full of sympathy for "little black people" whether overseas or not.  They seldom socialise with the lower classes and never socialise with the Black British.  Black British people are like white British people, some deal drugs and live in flats with milk rotting in the cartons, some are solicitors and send their children to private schools but in the South West of England there are few opportunities to meet any of these so they can be avoided and become the objects of sympathy.  Prior to living in the South West I lived and worked in South London so this is all like fantasy land.

Today I went to our local market town.  The bookshop had the theme of "Black Lives Matter" for its window display.  I looked down the street and there was not even an Asian let alone a Black face to be seen.  There were plenty of people who looked economically challenged.  What is going on?  This really is like fantasy land.

Of course, I know what is happening.  If you have loads of cash the uppity British lower classes look at you as if you are a posh twat, especially when you show that slight edge of fear from when you had to dodge the rough boys (like I had been) when you went from boarding school to town.  You don't like them.  Disgusting people with tattoos and rough manners.  Secretly you wouldn't feel too bad if they were taken down a peg or two, perhaps even, given that they have brought poverty on themselves and are not hard working like you, perhaps even, not too bothered about them not having enough food.  Now, black people on the other hand, they are obviously the victims of these uncouth working class louts so deserve a great deal of sympathy.  What is more, solving racism doesn't mean higher taxes whereas solving poverty and classism might mean a direct attack on your wealth and class.

The academic and upper classes find that anti-racism kills three birds with one stone: it makes them look holy, lets the media caricature the lower classes as racist thugs and diverts everyone from poverty and class.  Justin or Rupert who work for the Media can look like saints on telly and be patted on the back by Corporate patrons.  It is as if Marie Antoinette is alive and well and this time round is winning the revolution, "Let them eat dirt, the racist louts".

We should all remember that Nazism was a middle class movement and many of its middle class members supported Jewish migration during the Russian and Soviet pogroms before they supported Hitler. 

As a postscript, I communicated the gist of the article above to a middle class relative who lived near the town that had no people with black skins. Her response was: "but some of these people are the most dreadful racists".  She just didn't get it: there are no black people in her 100 square miles of England, whether there are racists or not is of little consequence except that it makes her rationalise her distaste for the poor and less indoctrinated in terms of a holy war against the evil working class English. She'd been nobbled by the media.  Obviously I didn't tell her that.

27/6/2020

(The Postmodernists worked all this out years ago and hoped it would not end well for society).












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage