Skip to main content

Rules for beating Covid-19


How can a country have a short, sharp COVID-19 epidemic then return to normal life?

Lockdowns should be early and sharp.  Countries that had serious lockdowns such as S. Korea and China brought the infection under rapid control.  Countries that had lockdowns before serious epidemics occurred stopped serious epidemics occurring.  The scale of the epidemics in different countries has been largely defined by the number of cases at the start of lockdown.

Serious travel bans should be implemented at the start of an epidemic.  The UK imported 20,000 COVID-19 cases, largely from the EU, which infected 50,000 other people.  The initial large scale of the UK epidemic was due to a very tardy travel ban and lack of quarantine of arrivals which guaranteed a massive infection before lockdown.

Coughs and sneezes spread diseases.  Face masks are essential, countries that made the wearing of facemasks in public mandatory seem to have reduced the scale of the epidemic below the level that might have been expected from the number of cases at lockdown (See Science Times Article).  There is up to a 10,000 Euro fine for failing to wear a face mask in public in Germany.   This was obviously going to work given that COVID-19 is a droplet borne infection.  The continuing large scale of the UK epidemic is partly due to a cavalier attitude to face masks.

"The big mistake in the US and Europe, in my opinion, is that people aren't wearing masks," said George Gao, the director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Telegraph.

The biggest rule for defeating COVID-19 is not to be defeatist.  The UK scientific advice was that COVID-19 would never be beaten, it would be with us forever so the best that we can do is "herd immunity".  Countries that have accepted this approach are looking like they will never defeat COVID-19.  All of the actions taken in the UK are compatible with this approach: why test and trace contacts if the objective is to infect most of the population?  Herd immunity does not need millions of tests, all that implementing herd immunity needs is to Protect the NHS from overload as the virus is allowed to run through the population.  Why shut the borders if you are after herd immunity?  Shutting borders will just slow down the inevitable.  Face masks will just stop people from getting immune.

The elite British Corporate Establishment float about above the population and don't really care about them. A few of the elite, like Sir David Spiegelhalter are honest and openly say that the risk for young, well people from COVID-19 is very low so herd immunity is an option.  They tend to make light of the fact that this policy will kill a very large number of those who are over 60 or who are immunocompromised.  In contrast ordinary British people would willingly lose their livelihood to save their neighbour.  The irony is that had the British Corporate Elite been less cocky and implemented policies to beat COVID-19 the disease would have been beaten by now and we would all be back at work.

This is not about Tory or Labour.  Labour would have done the same as the Government.  This is about the Corporate Elite itself which is embedded in Labour as much as in the Tories.  Starmer is a member of the Corporate Elite and even attends Trilateral Commission meetings.  The UK has a society where the hubris of those with money and power and especially education is intensified by the arrogance of intense classism.  This combination makes our Corporate Elite unhelpful at best.

It is a century since WWI and people have forgotten how our own, special, classist Corporate Elite can kill ordinary people needlessly and without conscience by repeating and continuing mistaken policies.

You may be asking "Why the vitriol?".  After 3 years of turmoil caused by the tantrums of the Corporate Elite over Brexit it is clear that their attitudes are a danger to this country.  It is no coincidence that the group that kept the borders open with the EU and killed thousands was from the same social group as created the turmoil after the Referendum.  Britain should always be on its guard against these selfish people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome