Skip to main content

EU is Desperate for Extension of Transition. UK Broadcasters silent.

The EU Coronavirus bailout plan will involve 750 billion euros split between 500 bn euros of grants and 250 bn of loans. (See Euractiv).

This huge bailout package is occurring as the UK drastically reduces its EU contributions to the relatively small amount needed to pay pensions etc.  The EU will lose almost a sixth of its income (omitting residual UK contributions).

The EU is hoping that Barnier and the EU negotiating team can pull off a coup and persuade the UK to extend transition for at least two years.  The free money from the UK will subsidise the EU bailout package.  The Remain media in the UK are backing the EU position, seemingly keen that money which should be used for UK bailouts is spent in foreign countries.

The reason that the EU wants the UK contributions is that every £10bn of cash income can be leveraged into £500bn of loans at 2%.  If the British allow the transition to be extended they will remove £500bn from expenditure in the UK and transfer this to foreign bailouts in EU countries.

Barnier has written a letter to all of the opposition parties in all parts of the UK offering a two year transition in the hope that they will attack the UK Government.  This "divide and rule" approach of the EU to UK internal politics is unacceptable.  Had the Russians done the same the UK opposition parties would have been reviled as traitors.  Fortunately for opposition leaders UK broadcasters have covered this up.

The EU bailout package involves increasing the contributions to the EU from member states.  At present member states pay an average of 1.2% of GNI and this will be increased to 2%.

Were the UK to rejoin the EU its contributions might rise from a gross contribution of about £17.4 bn to £29 bn (See House of Commons Library).  It is unlikely that there would be any rebates were the UK to rejoin.  The Brexit bus would have a truthful £557 million a week gross on its side.

According to the Euractiv article the various grants and loans will come with tight conditions to increase EU integration and control in Member States. The EU is a one way street to a single EU State.

31/5/2020

We must not lose sight of the fact that the EU-UK Trade negotiations are in bad faith and have been designed to punish the UK from the outset. It is only by having a clean break that the UK will get good terms in subsequent negotiations.

Comments

Nithya said…
I hope the bailout plan announced by the EU helps to manage the current economic crisis due to the Covid-19 spread. Last week I took part in the open debate session organized by Top IAS coaching centres in Chennai, and we discussed the internal politics of the EU and UK governments. It is high time that the EU and UK join hands together to fight against the current economic crisis.
John said…
Join hands yes, but the UK surrender its government to the EU, no. One does not need the other.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...