Skip to main content

China: Are we too late to react?

My joy at opening this week's AAAS magazine "Science" was slightly blunted by the four pages of Chinese Government advertising that were followed by a long editorial article on how the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) should be given NIH funds.  The article did not mention that due to the COVID debacle the WIV is now under Chinese military command so it obviously cannot receive US Government funding.  Even in science it seems that those who pay the piper call the tune.
I then see that China will shortly terminate Hong Kong's semi-independence. (See CNBC Report).

China is also increasing its military spending this coming year by 6.6%.  In 2019 China already had the world's highest military expenditure, allowing for the massive undervaluation of the Yuan (See OECD PPP value), Chinas military expenditure was $913 bn ($261 bn) compared with $732 bn for the US (unadjusted SIPRI figures in brackets).  The adjusted figures are correct because even the US is buying military components from China.  China is a mercantilist economy that is a global trading predator and has arranged for the Yuan to be worth far more inside China than the exchange rate might suggest (c.3.5 times undervalued).

According to the Rand Corporation China achieved parity with the USA in many areas of military combat in 2017.

In 2017 China had the military capability for a "draw" when invading Taiwan.  In 2020 China would probably win.  Most disturbingly China is rapidly increasing its ability to project power far from home.

China is already winning the propaganda war.  It seems to have deep control of the broadcast media in the West, for instance the BBC is still publicising 5G disinformation about COVID19 on behalf of the Peoples Republic of China and calling any truthful criticism of China over COVID "conspiracy theories".  In the EU and UK the broadcasters are steering well clear of analysing what "president for life " means or what the concentration camps for Uighurs actually signify about China. China has also deeply penetrated Western Academia, a surprising and highly successful move that derails academic analysis of the Chinese military and economic threat.  The penetration of academia is probably an unplanned bonus of its 1000 Talents and other "talents" activities.

China has also recruited allies in Western Big Business.  The dependence of Apple, Amazon and hundreds of other large Western Corporations on Chinese manufactures and markets means that they are inclined to the Chinese view on many matters.  When Big Business lobbies about China they are lobbying to increase China's advantage.

Putin expects that the 21st Century will be the beginning of Sino-Russian hegemony and Russia is likely to conclude a military alliance with China in the near future (See China-Russia alliance on horizon as nuclear arms treaties crumble ).

I hate to say that the West has probably "blown it".  Chinese power has grown as fast of that of the NAZI Third Reich grew in the 1930s and our politicians have failed to react. It only took Germany 10 years to become a superpower.  There might still be time to cage China, if we fail to do this there will probably be a war, if we fail to do that the next millennium is Chinese Nazism.

22/5/2020

Postscript:  The Chinese are disarmingly honest about their intentions. This comment was made by a Chinese commentator, Tong Zhao:
"Tong said China's conventional missile buildup has at least two broad objectives. One is to secure key national interests, such as reunification with Taiwan. Another is to assert territorial claims in the South China Sea and over the Japan-administered Senkaku Islands, which Beijing calls Diaoyu.
"The biggest threat to China securing these interests comes from the U.S. capability and intention to militarily intervene in these areas," Tong said. "Land-based intermediate range missiles constitute a very effective tool for China to secure a military advantage around the first island chain and deter American military intervention," he added, referring to the first line of major archipelagos off continental East Asia." (See China-Russia alliance on horizon as nuclear arms treaties crumble ).
China has been openly telling us for the past 20 years what they intend for the world and our broadcasters are either stupid or believe that the West will be eternally dominant or are being paid off.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage