Skip to main content

Philosophy, Science, Religion and Plays

Pythagoras first coined the term "philosophy" to mean love of wisdom.  Philosophy goes deeper than knowing about the world because it considers knowing about knowing.  It is the realisation that even when you know about knowing you still have to know about knowing about knowing and so on, ad infinitum,  so knowledge is an endless analysis of questions about answers.  Philosophers call this an infinite regress.

Science seemed to break free of the regress by focusing on the material world and making models of the world.  The model could be mathematical or it could be something as practical as a steam engine which is a model of transferring heat into motion.  Science yields a working description, a model of the world and calls this knowledge.  Science progresses by obtaining ever more accurate descriptions.

The reason people funded science is that it improved technology and this technology supplied better working models that could be traded.  Science has made possible a vast number of benefits from antibiotics to solar panels.

Science has not yet provided a good description of what it is to be human.  It has shown that dreams and imaginings activate the same parts of the brain as sensations and so has led to the idea that what we see in our brains is a copy of the world, a sort of virtual reality based on our senses. But what sees what the mind's eye sees?  It is clear that the model of ourselves is incomplete.

This brings us to religion.  If there are more questions than answers then why not stop asking questions and instead feel your way to reality?  Unfortunately this technique often leads to unreality.

The introduction of a God or Gods does help with the problem of personal idiocy.  If we sit quietly and listen to our thoughts it is obvious that whole words just happen, we don't consciously put together the letter sounds of h-a-p-p-e-n, they just happen.  It gets worse, whole thoughts just happen.  Where do they come from?  Most people don't carefully synthesise the letter sounds of their thoughts and if they laboriously examined the thoughts they would discover that they are just a melange of stuff they have accepted and heard.  If they asked "why" and "how" about every thought they would end up in the philosopher's regress and be forced to admit that they just don't know....  Religion offers a way out of the regress, according to religion God says your own ideas of everything are wrong, God is right in all things and it is the devil makes you overthink it.  If you follow this you might be lucky enough to be more relaxed and hence happier about life.  Sadly to be happy you may have swapped being an idiot for being a religious idiot, but not necessarily.

Lastly we come to Plays.

All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players;

This is the modern media conception of the meaning of life: a play, a living narrative.  It is a narrative so why not fully embrace the narrative of your thoughts?  All you are is the projection of this narrative to other people.  You should see yourself through the eyes of others and value yourself by the value they put upon you.  The media message is that you should be like an actor, like them. The message has worked, as sales of selfie sticks show.

Unlike religion, which has a stable or slowly changing script that you shouldn't really think about too much, the players are encouraged to live in their internal narrative.  A narrative that just springs into mind and is modified with every role and smartphone message.

Actors always work for those who produce the scripts.  At present the producers are still in the post-modern phase of tearing apart other ways of seeing life.   We can only dread what is coming as the main feature of the media production for the world is released.


“The unexamined life is not worth living.” Plato.

20/4/2020


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...