Skip to main content

A Better Future for the Internet

The Internet has been given almost thirty years to develop to its near final form.  Now is the time for the UK Government to mould it to the best interests of the whole country.

The internet is little different from any other communication system except that government has failed to regulate it properly.  Governments charge business rates on businesses operating from physical premises, they charge corporation tax on companies that operate in the UK, we have laws against stalking, threatening behaviour and obscenity.  The UK government must now regulate the Internet like they regulate the rest of our society.
The Internet connects countries through an international fibre network.  Each node where the network enters the UK is like a port.  Once in the country the data flows to other nodes run by, and on behalf of, Internet Service Providers (ISPs):
These nodes route the data to its final destination.  The regulation of the Internet should be based on regarding International Access Points in the same way as ports and ISPs in a similar way to shopping centres.


Here is a plan for ensuring that Internet Services are truly services for all of us:

  • A National Firewall is absolutely essential for national security, collecting taxes from overseas vendors and limiting crime.  The National Firewall would allow the points below to be enacted as well as preventing foreign sabotage of elections, infrastructure and business.
  • International Access Points should only be available to the https protocol where the government is a partner certificate authority. (ie: the government should have access to International Communications).
  • Social media companies must be regarded as publishers so they can be brought into the standard legal framework that is used for all text and image distribution.  It is absurd that electronic communication has been exempted from much of the law on literary works.
  • Pornography should be supplied on a separate .porn channel only accessible on the https protocol.  The government would certify each porn vendor by being a partner certificate holder.  Web browsers would only be able to gain access to .porn if the user has entered a secure password.
  • Ebay, Amazon and other goods emporia should be regarded as giant shopping centers.  Each local authority should be able to levy rates according to the usage from their area and able to demand that users from their area have a virtual, local online shopping centre that uses local delivery services.  ISPs would need to be licensed and would be bound by this to provide Local Network Services.
  • Satellite Internet Services should be jammed.  SpaceX may be the provider today but it will be a Chinese company tomorrow.
Many countries are establishing National Firewalls and the most famous is the "Great Firewall of China".  If the UK does not establish a National Firewall the threats from devices sold by the Chinese are massively magnified because they can be controlled directly from Beijing.  Countries that fail to establish National Firewalls that can block foreign traffic have disarmed themselves and their national infrastructure will be paralysed if there is a conflict with other advanced nations.  A National Firewall is absolutely essential for National Security.

Satellite based internet access must be made illegal or even jammed because they are obviously a violation of UK security.  It is surprising that the Chinese and Russians have not warned that they will shoot down Internet satellites.

Electronic communications are now too sensitive and central to our lives to allow the current anarchy to continue.

See The Hive Mind: The Future of the Internet for what will happen without intervention.


13/03/2020

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more