Skip to main content

The Death of Cash?

Some of the biggest banks in the world have combined to produce a payment system called "Fnality".  The system is a blockchain based digital money similar to Bitcoin. It will be rolled out internationally in 2021 to registered financial institutions.

It is strange that the banks are pushing this system because, potentially, it allows peer to peer payments without the banks operating as intermediaries.

Fnality is new because it is supported by a basket of giant banks and eventually it aims for Central Banks to underpin the value of its "Utility Settlement Coin" (the USC).  This is a big step forward compared with other cryptocurrencies which have always found the conversion into real world currencies problematical.

At first any meaningful digital currency will have a limited roll out to ensure that it does not fall into disrepute but within a decade a successful currency will be used generally.  The end of cash is a perilous development.  The State need only revoke your access to the payment system and you will have nothing.  It is ironic that Bitcoin was developed with the ostensible purpose of removing the State from currency control.

Banks backing USC:

    Banco Santander
    BNY Mellon
    Barclays
    Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)
    Commerzbank
    Credit Suisse
    ING
    KBC Group
    Lloyds Banking Group
    MUFG Bank
    Nasdaq
    Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
    State Street Corporation
    UBS

If digital currencies are inevitable and going to replace cash it is essential from the outset that there are a variety of such currencies with a complete ban on turning off payments and receipts by individuals.  Today turning off access might only be considered for evil individuals who threaten us all but tomorrow that individual could be you simply because there is a query about your tax return or balance of wealth or political opinions. Those denied access may literally starve.

17/2/2020


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome