Skip to main content

Immigration, Net Migration in the UK and Points Based System

The Government has just announced a new points based immigration system where 70 points are needed to migrate to the UK (10 points for speaking English, 20 points for having a job offer etc).  10,000 places will be allocated to seasonal workers.

Sky News had this neat summary:
Sky has covered the new system in a matter of fact way but the BBC launched a campaign against the system on behalf of the construction industry, minimum wage employers and the Labour Party.  It should be remembered that much of the population growth that fuels house building is due to migration and that the Labour Party depends on the migrant vote.

Migrants vote Labour because, like the young, they are unaware of the history of Labour largesse ending in economic disaster.  This imbalance in party support has a huge and disproportionate effect on Labour because the migrant vote is concentrated in urban constituencies which are traditional Labour strongholds. Over two or three generations the migrants will become fully part of our society so it is crucial for Labour to keep pouring in more voters and to maintain division.

In the year to June 2019 609,000 people moved to the UK (immigration) and 397,000 people left the UK (emigration).  The total net migration was 212,000. (ONS Figures).

Net migration has fallen by about 100,000 since the Referendum.  Much of this fall has been due to EU citizens leaving the country (151,000) and no longer coming to the UK in such numbers (199,000) although there was still a large net migration of 48,000 EU citizens coming to the UK last year.
The BBC, contrary to its Charter, represents the interests of large, often Multinational companies and foreign workers against our interests.  From the viewpoint of UK citizens, the people that our government represents, the new points based system is good news.  What matters to you and I are our job opportunities and these are certain to improve if foreign labour is reduced.  It is even possible that wages will rise if true labour shortages occur although the BBC hosts pundit after pundit to tell us that wages do not depend on the supply and demand for labour. The jury is out on wages but there can be no doubt that job opportunities improve when there are labour shortages.  Lower population growth also means lower house prices which again is good news for most people but would be trumpeted by the wealthy journalists at the BBC as a disaster.

What matters to me most of all is that the new immigration policy gives our land the best chance for survival, being the first real attempt at controlling population growth in the UK.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...