Skip to main content

Democracy and Non-Criminal Hate Crime

"Non-criminal hate crime" is not a crime because it is non-criminal.  So why is anyone bothered?  Read on.

When Harriet Harman framed the "Equality Act 2010" she introduced a method of law enforcement that was widely used in the Communist Bloc.  The Communists countered opinions that upset the State by making employers blacklist the culprits.  The Equality Act has implemented this system in the UK. In the case of what are known as "non-crime hate incidents" the incident can be entered on an individual's Disclosure and Barring Service record (the DBS record check superseded the Criminal Records Check - CRB - in 2012).  According to the Equality Act Gender and Race are Protected Characteristics so any employer will consider that they may end up breaking the law by hiring someone with a "non-crime hate incident" on their record.

The link between the Equality Act and the Hate Crime legislation is clear because hate crimes deal with the Protected Characteristics of disability, race, religion, transgender identity and sexual orientation.  It was intended from the outset that blacklisting for employment would be the means of imposing punishment.

This problem affects 120,000 incidents logged by the police between 2014 and 2019.

Any pressure group can easily respond to its opponents by getting their utterances listed as "non-crime hate incidents".  All that is needed is to report opponents to the police as people who made the recipient of comments feel hated or offended.  It is obvious that "non-crime hate incidents" are an affront to democracy and must no longer be recorded by the police.

The Equality Act 2010 should be repealed - see Equality Act 2010 - Read it and be Afraid. There is no place in a democracy for legislation that turns employers into generalised law enforcement and punishment agencies.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage