Skip to main content

Central America: what is going wrong?

Central America, from Panama to Guatemala is one of the poorest and most troubled regions of the world.  GDP per capita in current US dollars is in the range of $3000 (Guatemala) to $10000 (Costa Rica).  When you travel around it feels poorer than India despite the fact that there are obviously educated and able people everywhere.

The first thing that strikes you when travelling through this region is that prices are very high.  Fruit and bread are little cheaper than in Europe and the USA and restaurant, hotel and taxi fares are quite comparable with the West.  It is not like India, where for a £1 you can get a bag of pastries for a picnic, in Costa Rica or Honduras the £1 only gets you a couple of donuts, if you are lucky.  An economist would immediately be suspecting a huge Trade and Current Account Surplus for these countries that pushes up the exchange rate so than Lempiras, Quetzales and Colones are greatly overvalued. But the Balance of Payments is vaguely in balance, not in massive surplus. So why are prices so high compared with wages?

Why cannot local producers, who have the advantage of rock bottom labour costs, produce essentials such as flour for bread at prices that are lower than global norms?  When you fly over these countries it is striking that the fertile lowlands are covered in banana and palm oil plantations.  Ordinary agriculture is banished to relatively unproductive hilly and mountainous areas.  The plantations are enormous and homogeneous so are clearly in the hands of giant agribusiness. The words "Banana Republic" spring to mind.  Banana Republics were and apparently, still are, real menaces.  Giant agricultural corporations hold much of the political and economic power in Central America although nowadays they are being forced to share with cocaine smuggling cartels.  The ruthlessness of these corporations is legendary.

Honduras palm oil. See Rainforest Rescue

The situation is yet more complicated because of corruption.  Corruption is evident on the street and in the buses, let alone in the halls of government.  If you catch an ordinary, "non-stop", express bus in Honduras you only need to wait fifty kilometres before the driver is stopping everywhere taking cash from passengers and stuffing it in his pocket. There is a seamless join between shady business practices and outright criminality.  The brother of the President of Honduras is a major league drug smuggler.  The governing classes really only care about themselves and the population has absorbed this message.

In Guatemala the indigenous Maya are 51% of the population but are still being treated as an unwelcome ethnic minority.  Outright genocide such as occurred until thirty years ago has largely ceased but the Maya are still often unregistered and so denied access to health and education services and excluded from employment.  In a country with an average wage of c.$3000 pa and huge income disparities the discrimination against the Maya results in terminal poverty where the only "solution" appears to be to flee the country.  Unfortunately their plight is being used to cast Trump as a villain for refusing to allow entry to the refugees rather than to ask questions about the racist Guatemalan Government.  Western journalists collude in racism if it seems to be to the advantage of their patrons, we saw the same approach in the UK with the Calais migrant crisis.

Is there any solution for Central America?  A good start would be to stop blaming Trump and ask why people are fleeing these fertile and potentially rich countries.  I wandered round San Pedro Sula (the murder capital of the world) without an armed guard, its not that dangerous, but journalists stay on the US side of the "wall" screaming about their pet hate figures rather than finding out the truth.


3/2/2020

















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage