Skip to main content

Independence at Last - Hooray!

Thank you!  Thanks to all those who kept the governance of this country in the hands of the people who live here.  We still have a home that we can call our own.

Our independence is one of the most democratic and fair decisions ever made in the UK.  It was not just the Referendum that made this decision. In the 2017 General Election most parties promised to implement the Referendum and, although she was leading a faltering and weak government, Theresa May was returned to power on this promise.  In the 2019 General Election those who had obstructed independence (despite their 2017 promises) were punished.

One Referendum and two General Elections have shown that the UK truly desires independence. 

The enemies of independence have used character assassination, conspiracy theories and ID politics to revile the heroes of the independence movement such as Nigel Farage, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Boris Johnson, Arron Banks and Kate Hoey.  But think kindly on them.

Nigel Farage is the Solon of modern UK politics.   He even semi-retired after the Referendum thinking the job was done.  Jacob Rees Mogg and Mark Francois kept the light of independence glowing during the dark days of Hammond and May, the Remainers who promised to implement Brexit but then thwarted it.  Kate Hoey deserves praise as one of the few Labour MPs who supported the ordinary people against the EU.

The sheer enthusiasm and patriotism of Arron Banks deserves mention.  He made some serious errors in his keenness to get funding and marshal support but these were no worse than the use of US Investment Bank funding and other un-publicised and un-investigated behaviours of the Remain campaign.

It is fantastic how, despite having far less funding than Remain and their demographic being people who did not use social media, the campaign for independence won through.

We should celebrate these people.  They were flawed but heroes are always flawed, what makes them heroes is that they were dedicated to the cause despite the most brutal and hard fought campaign by our enemies.

One Referendum and two General Elections show that our independence is the most democratic decision ever made in the UK.

After the 31st January 2020 Britain has left the EU.  Remain ceases to exist.  Some Remainers will have joining the EU as their new ambition.  In five years time there may be a General Election that returns a party that desires to once again join the EU.  What are their chances in a Referendum?

In all the furore about Brexit our media have either missed the Franco-German Meseburg Declaration or downplayed it to avoid support for Leave.  The new pan-Eurozone budget is initially 17 billion Euros but will undoubtedly grow.  With a single Central Bank, budgetary oversight by the Eurogroup Council, a unified defence force and ever increasing trade interdependence there is little that can stop full Eurozone union except a highly improbable break up of the EU.  The EU is already a very different place from how it was in 2016. Even Le Pen supports the Euro knowing that France can now never leave. 

In five years time any party supporting joining the EU will need to justify the Copenhagen Criteria which assess the ability of applicant states to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.  Given that during the long Treaty process the UK obtained opt outs from political and monetary union it does not fulfill the Copenhagen Criteria at present.  In principle it should be rejected as a member of the EU by the EU.  Any party that wishes for EU membership will need to convince the electorate that joining the Euro, handing over defence to the EU, joining Shengen with total free movement of people and increasing the UK's budgetary contribution to the EU are worthwhile.  Those who supported Remain and wish to join the EU again will be faced with justifying the EU project instead of critiquing Brexit and they will lose.

On 31st January 2020 it is over, the UK will be permanently outside the EU.  Permanently independent, its own people governing its land, people and economy.  Rejoice!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage