Skip to main content

New Year Predictions for 2019

The most striking event of the past year and, in retrospect, of the decade, is the continuing rise of the Media Industry (Television, Film, News, Advertising, Social Media, Internet Sales, Computer Games etc).  It is now worth over $2 trillion worldwide.  In the UK alone it is worth about £100 bn.  This rise, coupled with immersion in smart phones, has created a new society of detached, networked people.  When this post-modern cloud of humanity touches opposition it can usually simply sweep it aside.  Those who control it can create angry, closed groups to influence the world outside.  These are the last years when those who tend their gardens, visit friends and family regularly and attend physical political meetings and social events will have influence.  Who will rule then?

In the UK the Brexit debate is resolving into three options.  The first is to pass Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement, the second is to leave the EU without a deal (or with a rudimentary set of agreements) and the third is to postpone Brexit.  There is a great deal of talk about Second Referendums but realistically such possibilities would take a year or more to come to pass.

If Theresa May is at all competent, and we must doubt this, expect the vote on the Withdrawal Agreement to be delayed until the last possible moment (perhaps 21st January).  It is only when the Irish are faced with the imminent possibility of definite borders after a no-deal Brexit that they will change their backstop from a perpetual Customs Union to a condition with an expiry date or a clear mechanism for removal.  If the Irish agree to this change the Withdrawal Agreement will, reluctantly, be approved by the UK Parliament.

If the Irish stick to their guns, something they are famed for doing, then Parliament will be faced with a battle between leaving with a rudimentary deal on March 29th or delaying Brexit.  The problem with the second option is that there is no other deal available so delaying Brexit is equivalent to refusing to implement it, delaying Brexit for second referendums etc. will be evidence of this refusal.

The greatest beneficiaries of "seamless" trade are the Media Corporations whose Network operates across all borders except the Chinese and acouple of Islamic countries.  If Brexit were delayed they will devote every resource to try to overturn it.  If this comes to pass we should all turn off our televisions, radios and social media to avoid indoctrination but we won't.

It looks like 2019 is going to be a poor year for the global economy, not terrible and not good.

The lowered industrial production in 2018 will feed through in early 2019 into a small decrease in GDP growth for many countries. Global population growth is about 1% a year so any increase in Industrial Production below 1% per annum is actually a fall in production per head. The whole world has not been getting much richer since 2012.

The stock markets of the world were overheated in 2017-18 and have been adjusting in the last quarter of 2018.  They are now not far off the long term price earnings ratio of around 15:1. Expect a slight overshoot of stock prices downwards followed by a small recovery later in the year.

The UK economy will be steady during 2019, Brexit or no Brexit.  The role of the EU in the UK economy has been massively overhyped by the Multinational Controlled Media.

Even a large, £20bn loss of exports to the EU will pan out at less than 0.5% fall in GDP because some of these exports will be sold elsewhere and there is £10bn + in tariffs to be collected from imports from the EU.  A No Deal Brexit would not be a particularly big deal despite the Bank of England and Treasury repeating Project Fear.

When Parliament finally, creepily, overturns the Referendum we British should continue to fight the EU Nationalists, but will we all remember never to vote Labour, Tory of Lib Dem again?



















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...