Skip to main content

"Crashing out" of the EU - how big a crash?

The Bank of England published this graph showing the effect of leaving the EU with no deal in its report: EU withdrawal scenarios and monetary and financial stability:



The graph is designed to look as scary as possible.  However, when we read the notes on page 53 we find this little gem:

"As economic conditions deteriorate, net migration falls from a net inflow of 250,000 per year to a net outflow of 100,000 people per year."

This is a massive change in population growth of 350,000 less people a year. Almost all UK population growth is due to migration and the children of migrants.  The reduction in migration will reduce the UK population growth by 0.56% of pop. per year directly, without allowing for children born to migrants.  This is excellent news because it means that the Bank's figures imply a GDP per head that is rising rapidly after 2020:

So according to the Bank of England figures we will all get a lot richer in the late 2020s if a no deal, no transition Brexit happens.It may well solve the UK's chronic productivity problem as GDP per head increases.

Don't believe this arithmetic?  Think about it, if you halve the population you halve the GDP but no-one gets particularly poorer, double it and no one gets richer but GDP is doubled.

Surely it is worth suffering half the set back that we experienced in the banking crisis to enter a period of subsequent prosperity?  These are the Bank's figures so anyone who is tempted to Remain in the EU should respect them.

The Bank of England confuses population growth with useful economic growth.  If we fall for this there is no hope of ever controlling population growth and preserving the British countryside and environment:



I would also like affordable housing for my kids.

A "no deal" Brexit offers:

Higher wages
Independence
Much lower migration
Higher productivity
Preserving the countryside
Lower house prices relative to wages

All for a short period of low growth in 2020. The Bank has used statistics to bamboozle the population, don't let them get away with it.  Remember, the predictions above were for the very worst "no-deal", this will not happen -  we have already seen that the EU will not let the derivatives markets collapse after a "no deal" Brexit and other negative factors will be fixed for March.


A WTO Brexit with a managed transition is probably better in the short term. It has few real consequences economically - see Plan B for Brexit and Bank of England gives green light for WTO Brexit

If you still don't think that GDP depends on the number of people in the country take a look at:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...