Skip to main content

Respect versus Union

In our personal lives respect is a desire to meet people with kindness and to acquiesce in their needs whilst in their company.  In your personal life union is agreeing to behave in the same way as other people.  Respect is a public, adult virtue, union is a private virtue between two people or, perhaps, within some families.  Union is agreed control, respect is a willingness to trust other people and a demonstration that you can be trusted.

Politicians and ideologists often speak of "union", often passionately.   What they mean is that they believe that they should govern a group of people and exercise a fairly intimate control over them.  They do not use the term "respect" for this process because respect implies that the people are trusted to govern themselves.

Politicians and ideologists understand that power over other people is based on union.  To be powerful in society you need a gang that will obey your rules.  If your gang is sufficiently large it can force people in general to follow the same rules and be united.

Those who desire union use fear.  They talk of enemies that may attack at any time, of poverty lurking around the corner.  Those who desire respect in our relations use re-assurance.

Ideologists extol the virtues of union by declaring that we could live in a land without fear or suspicion and would all love one another if everyone were united and believed the same things.  It is this use of the word "love" that is most despicable.  Love is largely respect, it is allowing others to develop in their own way, it is accommodating difference, not crushing it; it is serving others, not demanding that they obey your rules.  When the ideologists talk of harmony and "love" they are bending these words to acquire power: they really mean marching together.

The EEC was a treaty between countries that respected each other.  Decisions at the highest levels in the EEC organization could be vetoed by the least of its members.  The EEC no longer exists.  It has been replaced by the EU.  The EU is a Union between countries that is run by an EU Council where, since 2014, decisions are taken according to a majority vote.  Individual countries cannot maintain their independence.  There is no respect for independence, it is a Union.

The EU is about power.  It will provide the means for the governing faction to control an entire continent and impose its will on its neighbours.  NATO has defended Europe and kept the peace but the EU is designed for expansion and control.

First published 26/6/2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...