Skip to main content

UKIP, Racism and The European Elections

Read this article for full details of how UKIP has become regarded as a racist organisation.

UKIP says it stands for the Independence of the United Kingdom from Europe, however, it is the racism of UKIP that is always the main issue.

UKIP claims that the British people should restrict entry to their territory to preserve the land and preserve its resources for the people of the country.   Preventing the free movement of people is racist according to modern thought.  UKIP claims that in a democracy the electors vote for representatives who represent their interests and the interests of their country first and foremost.  According to modern thought this is immediately racist, preferring one group above another.

The issue is clear.  According to modern thought it is racist for countries to protect their environment and the interests of their people.  This is not a black and white issue.  It is Internationalists, people who believe in continental and eventual world government, who use the "holy" banner of racism to attack their enemies, who are attacking UKIP.  They have made a lot of people think that supporting their own country and interests is somehow immoral.

These Internationalists are the racists, there is no diversity without sovereign nations.   Global government means exchanging a world where there are many races and cultures for a uniform world of coffee coloured people all singing the same tune.  The Internationalists realise it is wrong to commit genocide so have opted for eugenics: breeding out the races.  They are motivated by cowardice: fear of difference and fear of war.  They have no hope that sovereign nations can live in harmony.

Those who want global unity do not understand that a single world government has the potential to be corrupted into a tyranny that will last for millennia. If you don't believe that megastates like Europe can be corrupt you have not heard that the EU accounts have never been passed and have not looked at other megastates like Russia, China and India. Those who desire a megastate because it will give "us" the power to "stand up to Russia" are warmongers.

People who do not think for themselves have even been persuaded that they would be bad people if they supported their own country.  They have indeed become bad people by letting themselves be duped like that.  If you are proud to consider yourself to be part of a holy gang that just shouts "racist" instead of discussing politics then you are a lost soul, this gang behaviour is typical of brown shirts or Maoist Red Guards. It is the Internationalists who are the true racists, they are deliberately destroying the diversity of nations and cultures.  If you call UKIP racist you are probably a bigger racist yourself.

UKIP claims that there is no economic advantage for the British in membership of the EU and that Britain is governed from Europe.  These claims are considered in depth in Membership of the EU: pros and cons.  These are the important issues for the British people.

Link to this article with:   http://tinyurl.com/neagkjs
 


Are they really racist or is it desperate propaganda?

Published 22/05/2014

Comments

Anonymous said…
You have a gift for expressing these things very susinctly in a way that no rational person could dispute. The problem for us is that our opponents are not rational and neither are the ideologies that they propagate. Do you have any thoughts on how to reach out to people, many of them perfectly respectable and normal people (if perhaps a little credulous), who are inclined to shout "racist" not because of internationalist bigotry but because they have been "programmed" to think and act in that way?
John said…
Perhaps UKIP could concentrate on the key issues. Population growth to 70 million (official statistics) will destroy our countryside and will result in famine towards the end of the century. Without immigration there would be population decline. The trade deficit with Europe was over £70 thousand million in 2012, this is unsustainable, it is a terrible mistake to make Europe our main trading "partner" at such a loss. British culture depends on British Common Law - innocent until proven guilty, trial by your peers, fair play - we will lose this in Europe.

These are all strong arguments. Continuously stressing these arguments and, at every opportunity saying that it is the Internationalists who are the racists, who want to destroy diversity, may do the trick.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...