Britain is in trouble, most people follow consensus morality. They end up agreeing with the "centre" which is defined by the BBC and government. Their morality could drift anywhere and wherever it drifts the people believe that they are holy. They believe that today is perpetually more moral and righteous than yesterday. As they drift they will inevitably offend those who have constant beliefs.
Do you know the difference between right and wrong? The modern British do not even discuss such things. They have no basis for their beliefs other than the consensus of the media yet every year become more intransigently righteous. This must end badly.
The terrorism in Britain is not a battle about Islam. It is created elsewhere.
Who set up the possibility of perpetual conflict in the UK and why? It is the university based extreme left that is churning out an endless supply of postmodern journalists, politicians and academics who are dedicated to removing any structure from our society (see Roots of New Labour, Subversion of academia, Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism). There is little in the way of conspiracy to achieve these ends, all of the action is open and obvious.
The end game of these individuals is globalization and State control:
"The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamour for such [repressive] laws if their personal security is threatened." Joseph Stalin
The idiot islamists and daft BNP are just putty in the hands of these forces and the London rioters are just ghosts with postmodern sticky tape over their mouths (See The London riots and the mediocracy). The islamists blow up ordinary people and the EDL mindlessly riot to become the "real threat" whilst the puppeteers in the media, leftist establishment and politics remain safe in plain sight. Not only are these globalizers in plain sight, people even vote for them.
The people believe that every day they are becoming morally superior in every way. Even though they are at the apex of morality today they will understand the immorality of this position tomorrow. Is that possible or are the people being led by the nose? Think.
OtherDo you know the difference between right and wrong? The modern British do not even discuss such things. They have no basis for their beliefs other than the consensus of the media yet every year become more intransigently righteous. This must end badly.
![]() |
and think |
Who set up the possibility of perpetual conflict in the UK and why? It is the university based extreme left that is churning out an endless supply of postmodern journalists, politicians and academics who are dedicated to removing any structure from our society (see Roots of New Labour, Subversion of academia, Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism). There is little in the way of conspiracy to achieve these ends, all of the action is open and obvious.
The end game of these individuals is globalization and State control:
"The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamour for such [repressive] laws if their personal security is threatened." Joseph Stalin
The idiot islamists and daft BNP are just putty in the hands of these forces and the London rioters are just ghosts with postmodern sticky tape over their mouths (See The London riots and the mediocracy). The islamists blow up ordinary people and the EDL mindlessly riot to become the "real threat" whilst the puppeteers in the media, leftist establishment and politics remain safe in plain sight. Not only are these globalizers in plain sight, people even vote for them.
The people believe that every day they are becoming morally superior in every way. Even though they are at the apex of morality today they will understand the immorality of this position tomorrow. Is that possible or are the people being led by the nose? Think.
If you do not understand this article see Do you have good intentions?.
The BBC is deeply implicated in the social changes - see BBC Attitudes.
If you were a globalizing postmarxist or corporatist you would be quietly confident that all was going to plan. See The future of globalization.
Comments