Skip to main content

Woolwich terrorism, government and the media

Britain is in trouble, most people follow consensus morality.  They end up agreeing with the "centre" which is defined by the BBC and government.   Their morality could drift anywhere and wherever it drifts the people believe that they are holy.  They believe that today is perpetually more moral and righteous than yesterday.  As they drift they will inevitably offend those who have constant beliefs. 

Do you know the difference between right and wrong?  The modern British do not even discuss such things.  They have no basis for their beliefs other than the consensus of the media yet every year become more intransigently righteous. This must end badly.
and think
The terrorism in Britain is not a battle about Islam.  It is created elsewhere.

Who set up the possibility of perpetual conflict in the UK and why? It is the university based extreme left that is churning out an endless supply of postmodern journalists, politicians and academics who are dedicated to removing any structure from our society (see Roots of New Labour, Subversion of academia, Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).  There is little in the way of conspiracy to achieve these ends, all of the action is open and obvious.

The end game of these individuals is globalization and State control:

"The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamour for such [repressive] laws if their personal security is threatened." Joseph Stalin

The idiot islamists and daft BNP are just putty in the hands of these forces and the London rioters are just ghosts with postmodern sticky tape over their mouths (See The London riots and the mediocracy). The islamists blow up ordinary people and the EDL mindlessly riot to become the "real threat" whilst the puppeteers in the media, leftist establishment and politics remain safe in plain sight.  Not only are these globalizers in plain sight, people even vote for them. 

The people believe that every day they are becoming morally superior in every way.  Even though they are at the apex of morality today they will understand the immorality of this position tomorrow.  Is that possible or are the people being led by the nose?  Think.

Other

If you do not understand this article see Do you have good intentions?.

The BBC is deeply implicated in the social changes - see BBC Attitudes.

If you were a globalizing postmarxist or corporatist you would be quietly confident that all was going to plan. See The future of globalization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...